The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0

被引:1458
|
作者
Kahrilas, P. J. [1 ]
Bredenoord, A. J. [1 ]
Fox, M. [1 ]
Gyawali, C. P. [1 ]
Roman, S. [1 ]
Smout, A. J. P. M. [1 ]
Pandolfino, J. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY | 2015年 / 27卷 / 02期
关键词
achalasia; dysphagia; esophageal motility disorders; high-resolution manometry; ineffective esophageal motility; HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY; CONTRACTILE DECELERATION POINT; AUTOMATED IMPEDANCE MANOMETRY; PRESSURE TOPOGRAPHY; BOLUS TRANSIT; NORMATIVE VALUES; ACID EXPOSURE; EGJ; RELAXATION; ABNORMALITIES;
D O I
10.1111/nmo.12477
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe Chicago Classification (CC) of esophageal motility disorders, utilizing an algorithmic scheme to analyze clinical high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies, has gained acceptance worldwide. MethodsThis 2014 update, CC v3.0, developed by the International HRM Working Group, incorporated the extensive clinical experience and interval publications since the prior (2011) version. Key ResultsChicago Classification v3.0 utilizes a hierarchical approach, sequentially prioritizing: (i) disorders of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow (achalasia subtypes I-III and EGJ outflow obstruction), (ii) major disorders of peristalsis (absent contractility, distal esophageal spasm, hypercontractile esophagus), and (iii) minor disorders of peristalsis characterized by impaired bolus transit. EGJ morphology, characterized by the degree of overlap between the lower esophageal sphincter and the crural diaphragm and baseline EGJ contractility are also part of CC v3.0. Compared to the previous CC version, the key metrics of interpretation, the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), the distal contractile integral (DCI), and the distal latency (DL) remain unchanged, albeit with much more emphasis on DCI for defining both hypo- and hypercontractility. New in CC v3.0 are: (i) the evaluation of the EGJ at rest defined in terms of morphology and contractility, (ii) fragmented' contractions (large breaks in the 20-mmHg isobaric contour), (iii) ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), and (iv) several minor adjustments in nomenclature and defining criteria. Absent in CC v3.0 are contractile front velocity and small breaks in the 20-mmHg isobaric contour as defining characteristics. Conclusions & InferencesChicago Classification v3.0 is an updated analysis scheme for clinical esophageal HRM recordings developed by the International HRM Working Group.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 174
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trends in diagnoses after implementation of the Chicago classification for esophageal motility disorders (V3.0) for high-resolution manometry studies
    Laing, P.
    Bress, A. P.
    Fang, J.
    Peterson, K.
    Adler, D. G.
    Gawron, A. J.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2017, 30 (12):
  • [2] A pictorial presentation of 3.0 Chicago Classification for esophageal motility disorders
    Herbella, Fernando Augusto
    Armijo, Priscila Rodrigues
    Patti, Marco Giuseppe
    [J]. EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO, 2016, 14 (03): : 439 - 442
  • [3] Comparison of Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders by Chicago Classification Versions 3.0 and 4.0
    Noh, Jin Hee
    Jung, Kee Wook
    Yoon, In Ja
    Na, Hee Kyong
    Ahn, Ji Yong
    Lee, Jeong Hoon
    Kim, Do Hoon
    Choi, Kee Don
    Song, Ho June
    Lee, Gin Hyug
    Jung, Hwoon-Yong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2023, 29 (03) : 326 - 334
  • [4] Comparison of patients diagnosed with ineffective esophageal motility according to the Chicago classification v3.0 and v4.0 definitions, 2011-2019
    Tuan, A. W.
    Syed, N.
    Panganiban, R.
    Lee, R. Y.
    Dalessio, S.
    Pradhan, S.
    Zhu, J.
    Ouyang, A.
    [J]. NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2021, 33
  • [5] Association of minor disorders of esophageal peristalsis with reflux and swallowed bolus clearance: comparison of Chicago Classification v2.0 with v3.0
    Hejazi, R.
    Simons-Linares, R.
    Devault, K. R.
    [J]. NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2016, 28 : 69 - 69
  • [6] Are Minor Disorders of Esophageal Peristalsis Associated with Reflux and Swallowed Bolus Clearance? A Comparison of Chicago Classification v2.0 with v3.0
    Hejazi, Reza
    Francis, Dawn
    DeVault, Kenneth R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 : S206 - S206
  • [7] Trends in Diagnoses Aft er Implementation of the Chicago Classification for Esophageal Motility Disorders (V3.0) for High-Resolution Manometry Studies at a Large Academic Medical Center
    Laing, Patrick
    Bress, Adam
    Fang, John
    Adler, Douglas
    Gawron, Andrew
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 : S214 - S215
  • [8] Pitfalls in the Interpretation of Chicago Classification for Esophageal Motility Disorders
    Herbella, Fernando A. M.
    Schlottmann, Francisco
    Patti, Marco G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2021, 27 (04) : 513 - 517
  • [9] Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Lessons Learned
    Rohof W.O.A.
    Bredenoord A.J.
    [J]. Current Gastroenterology Reports, 2017, 19 (8)
  • [10] Treatment of Esophageal Motility Disorders Based on the Chicago Classification
    Carla Maradey-Romero
    Scott Gabbard
    Ronnie Fass
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, 2014, 12 (4) : 441 - 455