Who'll stop lying under oath? Empirical evidence from tax evasion games

被引:19
|
作者
Jacquemet, N. [1 ,2 ]
Luchini, S. [3 ]
Malezieux, A. [4 ]
Shogren, J. F. [5 ]
机构
[1] Paris Sch Econ, 106 Bd Hop, F-75013 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, CES, 106 Bd Hop, F-75013 Paris, France
[3] Aix Marseille Univ, AMSE, Cent Marseille, EHESS,CNRS, 5-9 Blvd Maurice Bourdet, F-13001 Marseille, France
[4] Univ Bourgogne Franche Comte, Burgundy Sch Business, CEREN, EA 7477, 29 Rue Sambin, F-21000 Dijon, France
[5] Univ Wyoming, Dept Econ, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
关键词
Part-time Lying; Honesty; Oath; Commitment; Tax evasion; STOCHASTIC CHOICE; TIME; PREFERENCES; DISHONESTY; ETHICS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103369
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using two earned income/tax declaration experimental designs we show that only partial liars are affected by a truth-telling oath, a non-price commitment device. Under oath, we see no change in the number of chronic liars and fewer partial liars. Rather than smoothly increasing their compliance, we also observe that partial liars who respond to the oath, respond by becoming fully honest under oath. Based on both response times data and the consistency of subjects when several compliance decisions are made in a row, we show that partial lying arises as the result of weak preferences towards profitable honesty. The oath only transforms people with weak preferences for lying into being committed to the truth. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条