Subset Measurement Selection for Globally Self-Optimizing Control of Tennessee Eastman Process

被引:2
|
作者
Ye, Lingjian [1 ]
Cao, Yi [2 ]
Yuan, Xiaofeng [3 ]
Song, Zhihuan [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Ningbo Inst Technol, Ningbo 315100, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Cranfield Univ, Sch Energy Environm & Agrifood, Bedford MK43 0AL, England
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Control Engn, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
IFAC PAPERSONLINE | 2016年 / 49卷 / 07期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Tennessee Eastman; self-optimizing control; controlled variable; plant-vide control; CONTROLLED VARIABLES; CHALLENGE PROCESS; PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.227
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The concept of globally optimal controlled variable selection has recently been proposed to improve self-optimizing control performance of traditional local approaches. However, the associated measurement subset selection problem has not be studied. In this paper, we consider the measurement subset selection problem for globally self-optimizing control (gSOC) of Tennessee Eastman (TE) process. The TE process contains substantial measurements and had been studied for SOC with controlled variables selected from individual measurements through exhaustive search. This process has been revisited with improved performance recently through a retrofit approach of gSOC. To extend the improvement further, the measurement subset selection problem for gSOC is considered in this work and solved through a modification of an existing partially bidirectional branch and bound (PB3) algorithm originally developed for local SOC. The modified PB3 algorithm efficiently identifies the best measurement candidates among the full set which obtains the globally minimal economic loss. Dynamic simulations are conducted to demonstrate the optimality of proposed results. (C) 2016, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 126
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Retrofit Self-Optimizing Control of Tennessee Eastman Process
    Ye, Lingjian
    Cao, Yi
    Yuan, Xiaofeng
    Song, Zhihuan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY (ICIT), 2016, : 866 - 871
  • [2] Self-optimizing control of a large-scale plant: The Tennessee Eastman process
    Larsson, T
    Hestetun, K
    Hovland, E
    Skogestad, S
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2001, 40 (22) : 4889 - 4901
  • [3] Controller Design and Sparse Measurement Selection in Self-optimizing control
    Klemets, Jonatan Ralf Axel
    Hovd, Morten
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (18): : 458 - 463
  • [4] An Iterative LMI Approach to Controller Design and Measurement Selection in Self-Optimizing Control
    Klemets, Jonatan Ralf Axel
    Hovd, Morten
    [J]. 2017 11TH ASIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ASCC), 2017, : 2849 - 2854
  • [5] An intelligent approach of controlled variable selection for constrained process self-optimizing control
    Su, Hongxin
    Zhou, Chenchen
    Cao, Yi
    Yang, Shuang-Hua
    Ji, Zuzhen
    [J]. SYSTEMS SCIENCE & CONTROL ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [6] Self-optimizing control
    Li, PY
    Horowitz, R
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-5, 1997, : 1228 - 1233
  • [7] Self-optimizing control of gold cyanidation leaching process
    Ye, Ling-Jian
    Guan, Hong-Wei
    [J]. Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2017, 32 (03): : 481 - 486
  • [8] Optimal measurement combination for local self-optimizing control
    Kariwala, Vinay
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2007, 46 (11) : 3629 - 3634
  • [9] Self-optimizing control - A survey
    Jaschke, Johannes
    Cao, Yi
    Kariwala, Vinay
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEWS IN CONTROL, 2017, 43 : 199 - 223
  • [10] Decentralized control of the Tennessee Eastman Challenge Process
    Ricker, NL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 1996, 6 (04) : 205 - 221