Preoperative Bracing Affects Postoperative Outcome of Posterior Spine Fusion With Instrumentation for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

被引:13
|
作者
Diab, Mohammad [1 ]
Sharkey, Melinda [1 ]
Emans, John [2 ]
Lenke, Lawrence [3 ]
Oswald, Timothy [4 ]
Sucato, Daniel [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Boston Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Pediat Orthoped Associates, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Texas Scottish Rite Hosp Children, Dallas, TX 75219 USA
关键词
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; bracing; posterior spinal fusion; surgery; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ef5c36
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Multicenter, prospective clinical series. Objective. To investigate the effect of preoperative bracing on postoperative outcome of posterior spine fusion with instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. Bracing is the standard of care for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis between 25 degrees and 45 degrees, yet the efficacy of bracing is questionable. It is important to evaluate the effect of bracing on outcomes in the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis population. Methods. We reviewed the outcomes of 281 before surgery braced and 328 before surgery nonbraced patients who underwent posterior spine fusion with instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before operation and at 2 years after operation using the Scoliosis Research Society instrument (SRS-30) and the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire. Results. At 2 years after operation, nonbraced patients demonstrated a greater improvement in the SRS-30 Pain domain score (0.23 vs. 0.08, P < 0.001), more improvement in back pain at rest (26.7% vs. 20.5%, P = 0.0009), and more improvement in back pain in the past 6 months (42.4% vs. 32.6%, P = 0.039) compared to braced patients. Also at 2 years after operation, nonbraced patients reported higher SRS-30 Activity domain scores (4.38 vs. 4.32, P = 0.031), Satisfaction domain scores (4.53 vs. 4.42, P = 0.007), and Total scores (4.27 vs. 4.35, P = 0.036) compared with braced patients. The 2-year Spinal Appearance Questionnaire scores showed that nonbraced patients reported a greater "decrease in importance" than braced patients in having "more even shoulders" (79.4% vs. 70.5%, P = 0.03), "more even hips" (74.6% vs. 71.6%, P = 0.042), and "more even ribs in back" (78.4% vs. 69.5%, P = 0.05). Conclusion. Before surgery braced patients have more pain, lower activity levels, lower satisfaction, and lower total SRS-30 scores at 2 years after operation. Braced patients also have more "spine-specific" appearance concerns compared to nonbraced patients. These results suggest a negative impact of preoperative bracing on outcomes after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. This "brace signature" should be taken into account when brace treatment is being considered.
引用
收藏
页码:1876 / 1879
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE ROLE OF HARRINGTON INSTRUMENTATION AND POSTERIOR SPINE FUSION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS
    RENSHAW, TS
    [J]. ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1988, 19 (02) : 257 - 267
  • [2] Cervical spine sagittal alignment variations following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Canavese, Federico
    Turcot, Katia
    De Rosa, Vincenzo
    de Coulon, Geraldo
    Kaelin, Andre
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (07) : 1141 - 1148
  • [3] Cervical spine sagittal alignment variations following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Federico Canavese
    Katia Turcot
    Vincenzo De Rosa
    Geraldo de Coulon
    André Kaelin
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2011, 20 : 1141 - 1148
  • [4] POSTERIOR SPINAL-FUSION AND INSTRUMENTATION IN THE TREATMENT OF ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS
    YOUNGMAN, PME
    EDGAR, MA
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1985, 67 (05) : 313 - 317
  • [5] Postoperative ketorolac does not predispose to pseudoarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Sucato, Daniel J.
    Lovejoy, John F.
    Agrawal, Sundeep
    Elerson, Emily
    Nelson, Trudi
    McClung, Anna
    [J]. SPINE, 2008, 33 (10) : 1119 - 1124
  • [6] Type of Bone Graft or Substitute Does Not Affect Outcome of Spine Fusion With Instrumentation for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
    Theologis, Alexander A.
    Tabaraee, Ehsan
    Lin, Tracy
    Lubicky, John
    Diab, Mohammad
    [J]. SPINE, 2015, 40 (17) : 1345 - 1351
  • [7] Postoperative Dexamethasone Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
    Fletcher, Nicholas D.
    Ruska, Tracy
    Austin, Thomas M.
    Guisse, Ndeye F.
    Murphy, Joshua S.
    Bruce, Jr Robert W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2020, 102 (20): : 1807 - 1813
  • [8] Preoperative and early postoperative three-dimensional changes of the rib cage after posterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Delorme, S
    Violas, P
    Dansereau, J
    de Guise, J
    Aubin, CÉ
    Labelle, H
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2001, 10 (02) : 101 - 106
  • [9] Preoperative and early postoperative three-dimensional changes of the rib cage after posterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Sébastien Delorme
    Philippe Violas
    Jean Dansereau
    Jacques de Guise
    Carl-Éric Aubin
    Hubert Labelle
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2001, 10 : 101 - 106
  • [10] Continuous Infusion of Bupivacaine Reduces Postoperative Morphine Use in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis After Posterior Spine Fusion
    Ross, Patrick A.
    Smith, Brendan M.
    Tolo, Vernon T.
    Khemani, Robinder G.
    [J]. SPINE, 2011, 36 (18) : 1478 - 1483