Supporting communication of visit information to informal caregivers: A systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Bratches, Reed W. R. [1 ,2 ]
Scudder, Paige N. [3 ]
Barr, Paul J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, Geisel Sch Med, 1 Med Ctr Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Ctr Technol & Behav Hlth, Geisel Sch Med, 1 Med Ctr Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[3] Dartmouth Coll, Biomed Libraries, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 07期
关键词
POSITIVE ASPECTS; BURDEN; CARE; INTERVENTIONS; TELEHEALTH; DEMENTIA; PEOPLE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0254896
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Importance When caregivers cannot attend the clinic visit for the person they provide care for, patients are the predominant source of clinic visit information; however, poor patient recall inhibits the quality of information shared, resulting in poor caregiver preparedness and contributing to caregiver morbidity. Technological solutions exist to sharing clinic visit information, but their effectiveness is unclear. Objectives To assess if and how technology is being used to connect informal caregivers to patient clinic visit information when they cannot otherwise attend, and its impact on caregiver and patient outcomes. Evidence review MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and CINAHL were searched through 5/3/2020 with no language restrictions or limits. ClinicalTrials.gov and other reference lists were included in the search. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized trials that involved using a technological medium e.g., video or the electronic health record, to communicate visit information to a non-attending caregiver were included. Data were collected and screened using a standardized data collection form. Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used for RCTs and nonrandomized trials, respectively. All data were abstracted by two independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Findings Of 2115 studies identified in the search, four met criteria for inclusion. Two studies were randomized controlled trials and two were nonrandomized trials. All four studies found positive effects of their intervention on caregiver outcomes of interest, and three out of four studies found statistically significant improvements in key outcomes for caregivers receiving visit information. Improved outcomes included caregiver happiness, caregiver activation, caregiver preparedness, and caregiver confidence in managing patient health. Conclusions and relevance Our review suggests that using technology to give a caregiver access to clinical visit information could be beneficial to various caregiver outcomes. There is an urgent need to address the lack of research in this area.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECTIVENESS OF SUPPORTING INFORMAL CAREGIVERS OF PEOPLE WITH DEMENTIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Vandepitte, S.
    Van Den Noortgate, N.
    Putman, K.
    Verhaeghe, S.
    Faes, K.
    Annemans, L.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A407 - A408
  • [2] The effects of information and communication technologies on informal caregivers of persons living with dementia: A systematic review
    Lucero, Robert J.
    Fehlberg, Elizabeth A.
    Patel, Aditi G. M.
    Bjarnardottir, Ragnhildur, I
    Williams, Renessa
    Lee, Karis
    Ansell, Margaret
    Bakken, Suzanne
    Luchsinger, Jose A.
    Mittelman, Mary
    [J]. ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA-TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH & CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 5 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [3] Experiences of informal caregivers supporting individuals with upper gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review
    Furtado, Melinda
    Davis, Dawn
    Groarke, Jenny M.
    Graham-Wisener, Lisa
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [4] Effectiveness of respite care in supporting informal caregivers of persons with dementia: a systematic review
    Vandepitte, Sophie
    Van Den Noortgate, Nele
    Putman, Koen
    Verhaeghe, Sofie
    Verdonck, Caroline
    Annemans, Lieven
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 31 (12) : 1277 - 1288
  • [5] INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS FOR INFORMAL CAREGIVERS
    Hassan, A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S504 - S504
  • [6] Communication training programmes for informal caregivers of people living with dementia: A systematic review
    Perkins, Luke
    Felstead, Cerne
    Stott, Joshua
    Spector, Aimee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2022, 31 (19-20) : 2737 - 2753
  • [7] Knowledge and information needs of informal caregivers in palliative care: a qualitative systematic review
    Docherty, Andrea
    Owens, Alastair
    Asadi-Lari, Mohsen
    Petchey, Roland
    Williams, Jacky
    Carter, Yvonne H.
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 22 (02) : 153 - 171
  • [8] Challenges and Recommendations for the Deployment of Information and Communication Technology Solutions for Informal Caregivers: Scoping Review
    Hassan, Alhassan Yosri Ibrahim
    [J]. JMIR AGING, 2020, 3 (02)
  • [9] Challenges and Recommendations for the Deployment of Information and Communication Technology Solutions for Informal Caregivers: Scoping Review
    Hassan, Alhassan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2022, 22
  • [10] The effectiveness of interventions in supporting self-management of informal caregivers of people with dementia; a systematic meta review
    Veld, Judith G. Huis In Het
    Verkaik, Renate
    Mistiaen, Patriek
    Van Meijel, Berno
    Francke, Anneke L.
    [J]. BMC GERIATRICS, 2015, 15