The Content Quality of YouTube Videos for Professional Medical Education: A Systematic Review

被引:24
|
作者
Helming, Andrew G. [1 ,2 ]
Adler, David S. [2 ,3 ]
Keltner, Case [2 ,4 ]
Igelman, Austin D. [2 ]
Woodworth, Glenn E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Portland, OR USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Sch Med, 3181 Sam Jackson Rd, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[3] Northwestern Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Madigan Army Med Ctr, Dept Preventat Med & Publ Hlth, Tacoma, WA USA
[5] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Sch Med, Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
AUSCULTATION MATERIAL; HEALTH INFORMATION; INTERNET; RELIABILITY; RESOURCES; BEHAVIOR; PLATFORM; TOOL;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000004121
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the content quality of YouTube videos intended for professional medical education based on quality rating tool (QRT) scores and determine if video characteristics, engagement metrics, or author type are associated with quality. Method The authors searched 7 databases for English-language studies about the quality of YouTube videos intended for professional medical education from each database's inception through April 2019. To be included, studies had to be published in 2005 (when YouTube was created) or later. Studies were classified according to the type of QRT used: externally validated, internally validated, or limited global. Study information and video characteristics and engagement metrics were extracted. Videos were classified by video author type. Results Thirty-one studies were included in this review. Three studies used externally validated QRTs, 20 used internally validated QRTs, and 13 used limited global QRTs. Studies using externally validated QRTs had average scores/total possible scores of 1.3/4, 26/80, and 1.7/5. Among the 18 studies using internally validated QRTs, from which an average percentage of total possible QRT score could be computed or extracted, the average score was 44% (range: 9%-71%). Videos with academic-physician authors had higher internally validated QRT mean scores (46%) than those with nonacademic-physician or other authors (26%; P < .05). Conclusions The authors found a wide variation in QRT scores of videos, with many low QRT scores. While videos authored by academic-physicians were of higher quality on average, their quality still varied significantly. Video characteristics and engagement metrics were found to be unreliable surrogate measures of video quality. A lack of unifying grading criteria for video content quality, poor search algorithm optimization, and insufficient peer review or controls on submitted videos likely contributed to the overall poor quality of YouTube videos that could be used for professional medical education.
引用
收藏
页码:1484 / 1493
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality and Content Analysis of Hallux Valgus Videos on YouTube®
    Tekin, Sezgin Bahadir
    Bozgeyik, Bahri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2023, 62 (01): : 85 - 90
  • [2] Quality and Content Analysis of Carpal Tunnel Videos on YouTube
    Ahmet Mert
    Bahri Bozgeyik
    [J]. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2022, 56 : 73 - 78
  • [3] Quality and content analysis of female urethroplasty videos on YouTube
    Sahin, Yusuf
    Paslanmaz, Filip
    Ulus, Ismail
    Yilmaz, Mehmet
    Dincer, Muhammet Murat
    Muslumanoglu, Ahmet Yaser
    [J]. LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2023, 15 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [4] Quality and Content Analysis of Carpal Tunnel Videos on YouTube
    Mert, Ahmet
    Bozgeyik, Bahri
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 56 (01) : 73 - 78
  • [5] Quality of YouTube Videos on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Patient Education
    Hewitt, Joseph N.
    Kovoor, Joshua G.
    Ovenden, Christopher D.
    Asokan, Gayatri P.
    [J]. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY, 2021, 2021
  • [6] Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Metastatic Breast Cancer in Young Women: Systematic Assessment
    Morena, Nina
    Ahisar, Yitzchok
    Wang, Xena
    Nguyen, Diana
    Rentschler, Carrie A.
    Meguerditchian, N.
    [J]. JMIR CANCER, 2023, 9
  • [7] Quality of free gingival graft content in youtube videos: Usability in patient information and student education
    Bulut, Selcen Ozcan
    Ercel, Nihan Ozel
    [J]. MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2023, 28 (06): : E607 - E613
  • [8] Blood Sampling in Newborns A Systematic Review of YouTube Videos
    Bueno, Mariana
    Nishi, Erika Tihemi
    Costa, Taine
    Freire, Lais Machado
    Harrison, Denise
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL & NEONATAL NURSING, 2017, 31 (02) : 160 - 165
  • [9] YouTube Videos as a Source of Palliative Care Education: A Review
    Liu, Mandong
    Cardenas, Valeria
    Zhu, Yujun
    Enguidanos, Susan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 22 (12) : 1568 - 1573
  • [10] Comprehensiveness and Instructional Quality of YouTube Videos on Clinical Record-Keeping Training in Medical Education
    Emekli, Emre
    Kiyak, Yavuz Selim
    [J]. KONURALP TIP DERGISI, 2024, 16 (02): : 154 - 160