Reflective Access, Closure, and Epistemological Disjunctivism

被引:2
|
作者
Fratantonio, Giada [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Epistemological Disjunctivism; Access Problem; Externalism/Internalism; Epistemic Closure Principle; Reflective Access; McKinsey-paradox; ANTI-INDIVIDUALISM; EXTERNALISM;
D O I
10.1017/epi.2019.26
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In this paper, I consider the so-called Access Problem for Duncan Pritchard's Epistemological Disjunctivism (2012). After reconstructing Pritchard's own response to the Access Problem, I argue that in order to assess whether Pritchard's response is a satisfying one, we first need an account of the notion of 'Reflective Access' that underpins Pritchard's Epistemological Disjunctivism. I provide three interpretations of the notion of Reflective Access: a metaphysical interpretation, a folk interpretation, and an epistemic interpretation. I argue that none of these three interpretations comes without problems. I conclude that, until we have a clear and unproblematic account of Reflective Access, the Access Problem remains a challenge for Pritchard's Epistemological Disjunctivism.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 575
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条