Government R&D subsidies and firm innovation performance: The moderating role of accounting information quality

被引:47
|
作者
Zuo, Zhigang [1 ]
Lin, Zhibin [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Sch Accounting, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Durham Univ Business Sch, Mill Hill Lane, Durham DH1 3LB, England
来源
JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE | 2022年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
Innovation policy; R&D subsidy; Accounting information; R&D Investment; Innovation output; Patent; FINANCIAL-REPORTING QUALITY; DEBT MATURITY; CHINA; EFFICIENCY; ADDITIONALITY; COLLABORATION; GOVERNANCE; KNOWLEDGE; SUPPORT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jik.2022.100176
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The effects of government R&D subsidies can vary across recipient firms, depending on the various character-istics of a firm, potentially including the firm's accounting information quality (AIQ). It has been well recog-nized that high AIQ helps to reduce information asymmetry between investors and firms and, consequently, improves investment efficiency. However, there isa lack of clear understanding about the specific role of cor-porate accounting information in the ex-post effectiveness of government R&D subsidies. This study thus examines the main effects of government R&D subsidies on both firms' R&D inputs and innovation outputs, and the positive moderating role played by the quality of corporate accounting information. The data include 1,561 sample firms listed in the stock markets in China and 11,853 firm-year observations between 2007 and 2015. We find that the moderating effect of AIQ is economically sizable where an improved AIQ (discretion-ary accruals), by a standard deviation, increases the additionality effect by 16% for corporate R&D investment and 4% for the growth of firms' R&D inputs. In addition, we find the subsidies have a stronger favorable effect on firms' R&D outputs (the number of patents) for those firms with a higher AIQ. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Espaana,S.L.U
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The more the merrier? Chinese government R&D subsidies, dependence, and firm innovation performance
    Yi, Jingtao
    Murphree, Michael
    Meng, Shuang
    Li, Sali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 38 (02) : 289 - 310
  • [2] The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation
    Bronzini, Raffaello
    Piselli, Paolo
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (02) : 442 - 457
  • [3] Relationship between R&D subsidies and R&D collaboration in promoting firm innovation
    Dong, Huiping
    Guo, Yating
    Shi, Xing
    Du, Shaofu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2024,
  • [4] Government R&D Subsidies, Environmental regulation and corporate green innovation performance
    Shi, Hongyu
    Zhou, Qun
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 69
  • [5] Multinationality and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of R&D and Marketing Capabilities
    Masaaki Kotabe
    Srini S. Srinivasan
    Preet S. Aulakh
    [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2002, 33 : 79 - 97
  • [6] Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities
    Kotabe, M
    Srinivasan, SS
    Aulakh, PS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2002, 33 (01) : 79 - 97
  • [7] Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of marketing and R&D activities
    Kotabe, M
    Srinivasan, SS
    Aulakh, PS
    [J]. 2000 AMA EDUCATORS' PROCEEDINGS - ENHANCING KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT IN MARKETING, 2000, : 22 - 22
  • [8] Effect of government R&D subsidies on firms' innovation in China
    Wu, Ruirui
    Liu, Zhiying
    Ma, Chaoliang
    Chen, Xiafei
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, 2020, 28 (01) : 42 - 59
  • [9] Substantive or strategic: Government R&D subsidies and green innovation
    Zhang, Zeyi
    Luo, Xuehua
    Du, Jiating
    Xu, Baoliang
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 67
  • [10] Differences in the impact of R&D intensity and R&D internationalization on firm performance - Mediating role of innovation performance
    Leung, T. Y.
    Sharma, Piyush
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 131 : 81 - 91