Which IMRT? From "step and shoot" to VMAT: Physicist point of view

被引:10
|
作者
Lafond, C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jouyaux, F. [1 ]
Bellec, J. [1 ]
Henry, O. [1 ]
Perdrieux, M. [1 ]
Chajon, E. [1 ]
Le Prise, E. [1 ]
de Crevoisier, R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Manens, J. -P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Eugene Marquis, F-35042 Rennes, France
[2] INSERM, U642, F-35000 Rennes, France
[3] Univ Rennes 1, LTSI, F-35000 Rennes, France
来源
CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE | 2010年 / 14卷 / 6-7期
关键词
Intensity modulated radiotherapy; VMAT; Dosimetry; Quality control; MODULATED ARC THERAPY; STATISTICAL PROCESS-CONTROL; DYNAMIC MULTILEAF COLLIMATION; DOSE CALCULATION ALGORITHMS; TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEMS; IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; PROSTATE-CANCER; INTENSITY MODULATION; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.canrad.2010.06.012
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is essential to have a dose distribution matching with the planning target volume (PTV) in case of concave-shape target. Today IMRT delivery techniques with linear accelerator can be divided into two classes: techniques with fixed gantry, called "step and shoot" (S&S) and "sliding window" (SW), and rotational techniques, called intensity modulated arc therapy (IMAT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). We discuss about constraints for IMRT implementation from dosimetric planning to treatment delivery. We compare S&S and VMAT performances concerning dose distribution quality, efficiency and delivery time. We describe quality controls that must be implemented and the methods for analysis and follow-up performances. VMAT tends to yield similar dose distribution to MRT with fixed gantry. VMAT also decreases monitor units as well as treatment delivery time to less than 5 minutes. However, VMAT is an IMRT technique more difficult to master than S&S technique because there are more variable parameters. (C) 2010 Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 549
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVOLUTION OF IMRT QUALITY CONTROLS: FROM "STEP AND SHOOT" TO VMAT
    Lafond, C.
    Bellec, J.
    Manens, J. P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S457 - S457
  • [2] IMRT versus VMAT for breast: a dosimetric point of view
    Moorthy, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S771 - S771
  • [3] Step and Shoot IMRT, VMAT and Autoplan VMAT Nasopharnyx Plan Robustness to Linear Accelerator Delivery Errors
    Pogson, E. M.
    Hansen, C.
    Blake, S.
    Arumugam, S.
    Holloway, L.
    Thwaites, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3551 - 3551
  • [4] Comparison of total MU and segment areas in VMAT and step-and-shoot IMRT plans
    Kawashima M.
    Ozawa S.
    Haga A.
    Sakumi A.
    Kurokawa C.
    Sugimoto S.
    Karasawa K.
    Nakagawa K.
    Sasai K.
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2013, 6 (1) : 14 - 20
  • [5] VMAT and Step-and-Shoot IMRT in Head and Neck Cancer A Comparative Plan Analysis
    Wiehle, Rolf
    Knippen, Stefan
    Grosu, Anca-Ligia
    Bruggmoser, Gregor
    Hodapp, Norbert
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 187 (12) : 820 - 825
  • [6] Caveats of the point dose measurement in step and shoot IMRT QA
    Markovic, A
    Hrejsa, A
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) : 1867 - 1867
  • [7] For which patient which technique is the best from view of the physicist?
    Major, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S252 - S252
  • [8] Which intensity modulated radiation therapy? From "step and shoot" to volumetric modulated arctherapy, point of view of the radiation oncologist
    Vieillot, S.
    Fenoglietto, P.
    Moscardo, C. -L.
    Ailleres, N.
    Lemanski, C.
    Dubois, J. -B.
    Azria, D.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2010, 14 (6-7): : 550 - 553
  • [9] Treatment of prostate cancer: A planning study comparison of direct step and shoot IMRT and VMAT optimisation
    Treutwein, M.
    Hipp, M.
    Weidner, K.
    Koelbl, O.
    Dobler, B.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2010, 186 : 60 - 60
  • [10] Step-and-shoot versus VMAT
    Deisenhammer, T.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2018, 194 (11) : 1083 - 1083