Development and benchmarking of TASSERiter for the iterative improvement of protein structure predictions

被引:7
|
作者
Lee, Seung Yup [1 ]
Skolnick, Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Ctr Study Syst Biol, Atlanta, GA 30318 USA
关键词
TASSER(iter); protein structure prediction; TASSER; protein structure refinement; threading;
D O I
10.1002/prot.21440
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
To improve the accuracy of TASSER models especially in the limit where threading provided template alignments are of poor quality, we have developed the TASSER(iter) algorithm which uses the templates and contact restraints from TASSER generated models for iterative structure refinement. We apply TASSER(iter) to a large benchmark set of 2,773 nonhomologous single domain proteins that are <= 200 in length and that cover the PDB at the level of 35% pairwise sequence identity. Overall, TASSER(iter) models have a smaller global average RMSD of 5.48 angstrom compared to 5.81 angstrom RMSD of the original TASSER models. Classifying the targets by the level of prediction difficulty (where Easy targets have a good template with a corresponding good threading alignment, Medium targets have a good template but a poor alignment, and Hard targets have an incorrectly identified template), TASSER(iter) (TASSER) models have an average RMSD of 4.15 angstrom (4.35 angstrom) for the Easy set and 9.05 A (9.52 angstrom) for the Hard set. The largest reduction of average RMSD is for the Medium set where the TASSER(iter) models have an average global RMSD of 5.67 angstrom compared to 6.72 angstrom of the TASSER models. Seventy percent of the Medium set TASSER(iter) models have a smaller RMSD than the TASSER models, while 63% of the Easy and 60% of the Hard TASSER models are improved by TASSER(iter). For the foldable cases, where the targets have a RMSD to the native <6.5 angstrom, TASSER(ite)r shows obvious improvement over TASSER models: For the Medium set, it improves the success rate from 57.0 to 67.2%, followed by the Hard targets where the success rate improves from 32.0 to 34.8%, with the smallest improvement in the Easy targets from 82.6 to 84.0%. These results suggest that TASSER(iter) can provide more reliable predictions for targets of Medium difficulty, a range that had resisted improvement in the quality of protein structure predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 47
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Benchmarking Methods of Protein Structure Alignment
    Janan Sykes
    Barbara R. Holland
    Michael A. Charleston
    Journal of Molecular Evolution, 2020, 88 : 575 - 597
  • [3] Benchmarking Methods of Protein Structure Alignment
    Sykes, Janan
    Holland, Barbara R.
    Charleston, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 2020, 88 (07) : 575 - 597
  • [4] Is There a Bias in Protein Structure Predictions?
    Spinner, Leah
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2024, 33 : 143 - 143
  • [5] A Substantial Improvement in Predictions of Intrinsically Disordered Protein
    Williams, Robert W.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 108 (02) : 229A - 229A
  • [7] I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions
    Yang, Jianyi
    Zhang, Yang
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2015, 43 (W1) : W174 - W181
  • [8] A resource for benchmarking the usefulness of protein structure models
    Daniel Carbajo
    Anna Tramontano
    BMC Bioinformatics, 13
  • [9] A resource for benchmarking the usefulness of protein structure models
    Carbajo, Daniel
    Tramontano, Anna
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2012, 13
  • [10] Improvement of eukaryotic protein predictions from soil metagenomes
    Belliardo, Carole
    Koutsovoulos, Georgios D.
    Rancurel, Corinne
    Clement, Mathilde
    Lipuma, Justine
    Bailly-Bechet, Marc
    Danchin, Etienne G. J.
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2022, 9 (01)