Effects of electrode size and placement on comfort and efficiency during low-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps, hamstrings and gluteal muscles

被引:10
|
作者
Flodin, J. [1 ,2 ]
Juthberg, R. [1 ,2 ]
Ackermann, P. W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Sect Orthoped & Sports Med, Integrat Orthoped Lab, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Trauma, Acute Surg & Orthoped, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Electric stimulation therapy; Pain threshold; Patient comfort; Electrode configuration; Skeletal muscles; INTERMITTENT; RECOVERY; POSITION;
D O I
10.1186/s13102-022-00403-7
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may prevent muscle atrophy, accelerate rehabilitation and enhance blood circulation. Yet, one major drawback is that patient compliance is impeded by the discomfort experienced. It is well-known that the size and placement of electrodes affect the comfort and effect during high-intensity NMES. However, during low-intensity NMES the effects of electrode size/placement are mostly unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate how electrode size and pragmatic placement affect comfort and effect of low-intensity NMES in the thigh and gluteal muscles. Methods On 15 healthy participants, NMES-intensity (mA) was increased until visible muscle contraction, applied with three electrode sizes (2 x 2 cm, 5 x 5 cm, 5 x 9 cm), in three different configurations on quadriceps and hamstrings (short-transverse (ST), long-transverse (LT), longitudinal (L)) and two configurations on gluteus maximus (short-longitudinal (SL) and long-longitudinal (LL)). Current-density (mA/cm(2)) required for contraction was calculated for each electrode size. Comfort was assessed with a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10). Significance was set to p < 0.05 and values were expressed as median (inter-quartile range). Results On quadriceps the LT-placement exhibited significantly better comfort and lower current intensity than the ST- and L-placements. On hamstrings the L-placement resulted in the best comfort together with the lowest intensity. On gluteus maximus the LL-placement demonstrated better comfort and required less intensity than SL-placement. On all muscles, the 5 x 5 cm and 5 x 9 cm electrodes were significantly more comfortable and required less current-density for contraction than the 2 x 2 cm electrode. Conclusion During low-intensity NMES-treatment, an optimized electrode size and practical placement on each individual muscle of quadriceps, hamstrings and gluteals is crucial for comfort and intensity needed for muscle contraction.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Effects of electrode size and placement on comfort and efficiency during low-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps, hamstrings and gluteal muscles
    J. Flodin
    R. Juthberg
    P. W. Ackermann
    [J]. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 14
  • [2] Effect of electrode position of low intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the evoked force in the quadriceps femoris muscle
    Watanabe K.
    Kawade S.
    Moritani T.
    [J]. BMC Research Notes, 10 (1)
  • [3] EFFECTS OF WAVEFORM ON COMFORT DURING NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    BAKER, LL
    BOWMAN, BR
    MCNEAL, DR
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1988, (233) : 75 - 85
  • [4] Knee extensor force production and discomfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps with and without gluteal muscle co-stimulation
    Flodin, J.
    Mikkelsen, C.
    Ackermann, P. W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 122 (06) : 1521 - 1530
  • [5] Knee extensor force production and discomfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps with and without gluteal muscle co-stimulation
    J. Flodin
    C. Mikkelsen
    P. W. Ackermann
    [J]. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2022, 122 : 1521 - 1530
  • [6] Quadriceps Torque During High- And Low-frequency Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
    Magee, Dillon M.
    Mettler, Joni A.
    Doucet, Barbara M.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (05): : 1037 - 1037
  • [7] Acute Effects of Low-Intensity Electrical Stimulation on Segmental Arterial Stiffness
    Oda, Hiroyuki
    Fujibayashi, Mami
    Matsumoto, Naoyuki
    Nishiwaki, Masato
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [8] Effects of low intensity electrical stimulation on quadriceps muscle voluntary maximal strength
    Valli, P
    Boldrini, L
    Bianchedi, D
    Brizzi, G
    Miserocchi, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 2002, 42 (04): : 425 - 430
  • [9] Recommendations to Increase Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Training Intensity During Quadriceps Treatments for Orthopedic Knee Conditions
    Bremner, Cody B.
    Holcomb, William R.
    Miller, Michael G.
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2021, 31 (03): : 330 - 334
  • [10] Differential effects of low-intensity motor cortical stimulation on the inspiratory activity in scalene muscles during voluntary and involuntary breathing
    Petersen, Nicolas C.
    Taylor, Janet L.
    Murray, Nicholas P. S.
    Gandevia, Simon C.
    Butler, Jane E.
    [J]. RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY, 2011, 175 (02) : 265 - 271