Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion targeted prostate biopsy finds more significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive Japanese men compared with the standard biopsy

被引:10
|
作者
Fujii, Shinsuke [1 ]
Hayashi, Tetsutaro [1 ]
Honda, Yukiko [2 ]
Terada, Hiroaki [2 ]
Akita, Ryuji [3 ]
Kitamura, Naoyuki [4 ]
Ueda, Eikoh [4 ]
Han, Xiangrui [1 ]
Ueno, Takeshi [1 ]
Miyamoto, Shunsuke [1 ]
Kitano, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Inoue, Shogo [1 ]
Teishima, Jun [1 ]
Abdi, Hamidreza [5 ]
Awai, Kazuo [2 ]
Takeshima, Yukio [6 ]
Sentani, Kazuhiro [7 ]
Yasui, Wataru [7 ]
Matsubara, Akio [1 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Inst Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Urol, Hiroshima, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Univ, Inst Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol, Hiroshima, Japan
[3] Hiroshima Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Support, Sect Radiat Therapy, Hiroshima, Japan
[4] Kasumi Clin, Hiroshima, Japan
[5] Univ Ottawa, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Hiroshima Univ, Inst Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Pathol, Hiroshima, Japan
[7] Hiroshima Univ, Inst Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Mol Pathol, Hiroshima, Japan
关键词
cancer detection rate; clinically significant cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate cancer; targeted biopsy; DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT VALUES; TRANSITION ZONE CANCERS; ULTRASOUND FUSION; GUIDED BIOPSY; GUIDELINES; ACCURACY; SYSTEM; TRIAL; MRI;
D O I
10.1111/iju.14149
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the clinical benefits of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy for biopsy-naive Japanese men. Methods Between February 2017 and August 2018, 131 biopsy-naive men who underwent targeted biopsy together with 10-core systematic biopsy at Hiroshima University Hospital were retrospectively investigated. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings were reported based on Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2. Results The overall cancer detection rates per patient were 69.5% in systematic biopsy + targeted biopsy cores, 61.1% in systematic biopsy cores and 61.1% in targeted biopsy cores. The detection rates for clinically significant prostate cancer were 43.5% in targeted biopsy cores and 35.9% in systematic biopsy cores (P = 0.04), whereas the detection rates for clinically insignificant prostate cancer were 17.6% and 25.2% respectively (P = 0.04). Lesions in the peripheral zone were diagnosed more with clinically significant prostate cancer (54.8% vs 20.7%, P < 0.001) and International Society of Urological Pathology grade (3.2 vs 2.7, P = 0.02) than that in the inner gland. Just 4.2% (3/71) of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System category 2 and 3 lesions in the middle or base of the inner gland were found to have clinically significant prostate cancer. The cancer detection rate per core was 42.3% in targeted biopsy cores, whereas it was 17.9% in systematic biopsy cores (P < 0.001). Conclusions Targeted biopsy is able to improve the diagnostic accuracy of biopsy in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by reducing the number of clinically insignificant prostate cancer detections compared with 10-core systematic biopsy in biopsy-naive Japanese men. In addition, the present findings suggest that patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System category 2 or 3 lesions at the middle or base of the inner gland might avoid biopsies.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 146
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Editorial Comment from Dr Shiota to Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion targeted prostate biopsy finds more significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive Japanese men compared with the standard biopsy
    Shiota, Masaki
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (02) : 147 - 148
  • [2] Editorial Comment from Dr Ukimura to Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion targeted prostate biopsy finds more significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive Japanese men compared with the standard biopsy
    Ukimura, Osamu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (02) : 146 - 147
  • [3] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy Compared with Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer
    Alkema, Nicolette G.
    Hoogeveen, Sebastiaan F. J. S.
    Cauberg, Evelyne C. C.
    Witte, Lambertus P. W.
    van't Veer-ten Kate, Miranda
    de Boer, Erwin
    Hoogland, Marije A. M.
    Blanker, Marco H.
    Boomsma, Martijn F.
    Steffens, Martijn G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 44 : 125 - 130
  • [4] The accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive patients using combined magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy
    Uno, Hiromi
    Taniguchi, Tomoki
    Seike, Kensaku
    Kato, Daiki
    Takai, Manabu
    Iinuma, Koji
    Horie, Kengo
    Nakane, Keita
    Koie, Takuya
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (07) : 2982 - 2989
  • [5] Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Transrectal Ultrasonography Biopsy for Biopsy-Naive Men at Risk for Prostate Cancer A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial
    Klotz, Laurence
    Chin, Joseph
    Black, Peter C.
    Finelli, Antonio
    Anidjar, Maurice
    Bladou, Franck
    Machado, Ashley
    Levental, Mark
    Ghai, Sangeet
    Chang, Sylvia
    Milot, Laurent
    Patel, Chirag
    Kassam, Zahra
    Moore, Carolyn
    Kasivisanathan, Veeru
    Loblaw, Andrew
    Kebabdjian, Marlene
    Earle, Craig C.
    Pond, Greg R.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2021, 7 (04) : 534 - 542
  • [6] TARGETED VS STANDARD PROSTATE BIOPSY: A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL IN BIOPSY-NAIVE MEN
    Elkhoury, Fuad
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Kwan, Lorna
    Felker, Ely
    Delfin, Merdie
    Sisk, Anthony
    Marks, Leonard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E480 - E480
  • [7] Prospective comparison of transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion biopsy and transrectal systematic biopsy in biopsy-naive patients
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Platzek, Ivan
    Toma, Marieta
    Torsev, Georgi
    Renner, Theresa
    Herout, Roman
    Baunacke, Martin
    Laniado, Michael
    Baretton, Gustavo
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    Kesch, Claudia
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Froehner, Michael
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Wirth, Manfred
    Zastrow, Stefan
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [9] The Impact of Prostate Volume on Prostate Cancer Detection: Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Transrectal Ultrasound in Biopsy-naive Men
    Ye, Jianjun
    Zhang, Chichen
    Zheng, Lei
    Wang, Qihao
    Wu, Qiyou
    Tu, Xiang
    Bao, Yige
    Wei, Qiang
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 64 : 1 - 8
  • [10] Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naive men with suspicion of prostate cancer
    Hansen, Nienke L.
    Barrett, Tristan
    Kesch, Claudia
    Pepdjonovic, Lana
    Bonekamp, David
    O'Sullivan, Richard
    Distler, Florian
    Warren, Anne
    Samel, Christina
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Grummet, Jeremy
    Kastner, Christof
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (01) : 40 - 49