Open Research Data Repositories: A Content Analysis to Comprehend Data Equitable Access

被引:1
|
作者
Bhardwaj, Raj Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delhi, St Stephens Coll, Delhi 110007, India
关键词
Research Data; Content Analysis; Data Repository; Researchers; Open Data; RESEARCH DATA-MANAGEMENT; DISCOVERY; SCIENCES; METADATA;
D O I
10.5530/jscires.8.3.29
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The present study pertains to content analysis of open Research Data Repositories (RDRs) worldwide to comprehend the growth and development in the area. The study is original because no attempt has been made so far to do a content analysis of these open research data repositories. The study used the content analysis method of open RDRs listed on the registry of research data repositories. The dataset was analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Each unique parameter was given a unique variable for the purpose of analysis. Subsequently, the dataset was analyzed using Microsoft Excel to achieve the objectives of the study. A simple percentage method was followed in analyses and is presented through Tables and Figures. The study found that there are 1997 RDRs are open worldwide, which are indexed in the registry of research data repositories. It was also found that out of these data repositories 1509 (75.6 percent) are 'disciplinary', 'institutional' 398 (19.9 percent) and 'others' 90 (4.5 percent). Majority open RDRs worldwide use the World Data System (WDS) certification followed by Core Trust Seal. The study found total 70 countries in the world have 1997 RDRs and the United States is the leading country with 704 (35.3 percent) open RDRs, followed by Germany 201 (10.1 percent), United Kingdom 183 (9.2 percent), Canada 118 (5.9 percent). Scientific and statistical data formats are available in maximum (1238) open research data repositories, followed by standard office documents (1108), images (1047), plain text (935), raw data (881). It is ascertained that 1049 (52.5) RDRs are not following any metadata standard in open RDRs and 948 (47.5 percent) follow metadata standards. It was ascertained that Dublin Core is being used by (237) data repositories, followed by ISO 19115 (128), Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) (125). It was found that 963 (48.2 percent) data repositories are using unknown and in-house developed software worldwide. Majority of research data repositories contains the material relating to 'Biology' 715 (23.0 percent). Besides this, the study found that open data repositories have been developed in 60 languages worldwide.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 142
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A study of Open Access research data repositories developed by BRICS countries
    Misgar, Safat Mushtaq
    Bhat, Ajra
    Wani, Zahid Ashraf
    [J]. DIGITAL LIBRARY PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 37 (01) : 26 - 35
  • [2] A study of Open Access research data repositories developed by BRICS countries
    Misgar, Safat Mushtaq
    Bhat, Ajra
    Wani, Zahid Ashraf
    [J]. DIGITAL LIBRARY PERSPECTIVES, 2022, 38 (01) : 45 - 54
  • [3] Data Quality Issues and Content Analysis for Research Data Repositories: The Case of Dryad
    Rousidis, Dimitris
    Garoufallou, Emmanouel
    Balatsoukas, Panos
    Sicilia, Miguel-Angel
    [J]. LET'S PUT DATA TO USE: DIGITAL SCHOLARSHIP FOR THE NEXT GENERATION, 2014, : 49 - 58
  • [4] Content Analysis of Indian Research Data Repositories: Prospects and Possibilities
    Bhardwaj, Raj Kumar
    [J]. DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 39 (06): : 280 - 289
  • [5] Enhancement of Data Quality in Distributed Open Access Repositories
    Severiens, Thomas
    Klatt-Kafemann, Manuel
    Malitz, Robin
    [J]. GET THE GOOD CRIS GOING: ENSURING QUALITY OF SERVICE FOR THE USER IN THE ERA, 2008, : 71 - 75
  • [6] Funding models for Open Access digital data repositories
    Kitchin, Rob
    Collins, Sandra
    Frost, Dermot
    [J]. ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2015, 39 (05) : 664 - 681
  • [7] Science 2.0 supported by Open Access Repositories and Open Linked Data
    Ferreras-Fernandez, Transito
    Merlo-Vega, Jose A.
    Garcia-Penalvo, Francisco J.
    [J]. FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGICAL ECOSYSTEM FOR ENHANCING MULTICULTURALITY (TEEM'13), 2013, : 331 - 332
  • [8] Research data repositories: a comparative analysis
    Barrientos, Eder Avila
    [J]. REVISTA GENERAL DE INFORMACION Y DOCUMENTACION, 2024, 34 (01): : 69 - 83
  • [10] Guidelines for deposit, access and use of research data: proposal based on the analysis of international university data repositories
    Silveira, Jaqueline Insaurriaga
    Vanz, Samile Andrea de Souza
    [J]. ATOZ-NOVAS PRATICAS EM INFORMACAO E CONHECIMENTO, 2023, 12