Can end-users' flood management decision making be improved by information about forecast uncertainty?

被引:42
|
作者
Frick, J. [1 ]
Hegg, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
关键词
Risk communication; Understanding probability; Ensemble forecasting; Warning; Knowledge; PERCEPTION; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.12.006
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
In the course of the D-PHASE project, a visualisation platform was created, which provided a large amount of meteorological and hydrological information that was used not only by scientists, but also by scientifically aware laypeople in the field of flood prevention. This paper investigates the benefits of the platform for its end-users' situation analysis and decision making, and in particular, its usefulness in providing an ensemble of models instead of already interpreted forecasts. To evaluate the platform's impact on users in Switzerland, a panel approach was used. Twenty-four semi-standardized questionnaires were completed at the beginning of the demonstration phase and 27 questionnaires were completed five months later. The results suggest that the platform was perceived as adding value to both situation analysis and decision making, and helped users to feel more confident about both. Interestingly, users' preference for receiving complex, primary information and forming their own impressions over receiving interpreted information and recommendations increased during the demonstration phase. However, no actual improvement in the quality of decisions was reported. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 303
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Applications development by end-users: can quality be improved?
    Kreie, J
    Cronan, TP
    Pendley, J
    Renwick, JS
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2000, 29 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [2] End-Users Decision Making Factors for Heating and Cooling Systems
    Lambertucci, Stefano
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH ISES EUROSUN 2016 CONFERENCE, 2017, : 729 - 737
  • [3] Personalized Web recommendations: Supporting epistemic information about end-users
    Preda, M
    Popescu, D
    [J]. 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 692 - 695
  • [4] Can Decision Theory Help End-Users Take the Appropriate Action in an Emergency?
    Harvey, Natalie J.
    Western, Luke M.
    Dacre, Helen F.
    Capponi, Antonio
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 103 (10) : E2176 - E2187
  • [5] End-users' acceptance of intelligent decision-making: A case study in digital agriculture
    Wang, Yi-Jia
    Wang, Naihui
    Li, Mo
    Li, Heng
    Huang, George Q.
    [J]. ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2024, 60
  • [6] On the communication of statistical information about uncertainty in flood risk management
    Poortvliet, P. Marijn
    Knotters, Martin
    Bergsma, Petra
    Verstoep, Joel
    van Wijk, Jiska
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 118 : 194 - 204
  • [7] Social media analytics for end-users' expectation management in information systems development projects
    Banerjee, Snehasish
    Singh, Jyoti Prakash
    Dwivedi, Yogesh K.
    Rana, Nripendra P.
    [J]. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE, 2021, 34 (06) : 1600 - 1614
  • [8] How can geologic decision-making under uncertainty be improved?
    Wilson, Cristina G.
    Bond, Clare E.
    Shipley, Thomas F.
    [J]. SOLID EARTH, 2019, 10 (05) : 1469 - 1488
  • [9] Flood risk, uncertainty, and scientific information for decision making - Lessons from an interdisciplinary project
    Morss, RE
    Wilhelmi, OV
    Downton, MW
    Gruntfest, E
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 86 (11) : 1593 - 1601
  • [10] Getting critical weather and flood information to end-users: a comparison of the integrated weather effects decision aid (IWEDA) and the local data acquisition and dissemination (LDAD) systems
    Adams, CR
    Eis, KE
    [J]. 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERACTIVE INFORMATION AND PROCESSING SYSTEMS (IIPS) FOR METEOROLOGY, OCEANOGRAPHY AND HYDROLOGY, 2000, : 183 - 186