Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with different non-contact devices in healthy children

被引:0
|
作者
Yalcin, Sibel Oskan [1 ,2 ]
Kaplan, Aysin Tuba [1 ]
机构
[1] Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hosp, Dept Opthalmol, Pastel Insaat Sitesi Yesil 2,Blok 6 Daire 2 Kartal, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Central corneal thickness; CCT measurements; Contact specular microscopy; Contact in CCT; Optical low -coherence reflectometry; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; ULTRASOUND PACHYMETRY; SPECULAR MICROSCOPY; LENSTAR; CURVATURE; PENTACAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.103045
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the agreement of the Combined Scheimpflug-Placido Disk System (Sirius), specular microscopy (Tomey EM-4000), non-contact tonopachymetry (Canon TX-20P), and optical low-coherence reflectometry (Lenstar LS 900) devices in the measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT) in healthy children. Method: Eighty-three eyes from 83 healthy children were included in the study. The mean age of the children was 11.1 +/- 2.8 (range, 7-17) years. CCT was measured using the Sirius topography, Tomey specular microscopy, Canon TX-20P, and Lenstar LS 900 devices. To examine the agreement among these devices, 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were determined. Results: The mean CCT values obtained using the Sirius topography, Tomey SM, Canon TX-20 P, and Lenstar 900 devices were 555.9 +/- 37 mu m, 553.5 +/- 39 mu m, 569.3 +/- 33 mu m, and 559.7 +/- 38 mu m, respectively. With the ICC method, the agreement rates were determined as 0.875 between Canon TX-20P and Sirius topography, 0.903 between Canon TX-20P and Lenstar LS 900, 0.842 between Canon TX-20P and Tomey EM-4000, 0.979 between Sirius Topography and Lenstar LS 900, 0.978 between Sirius topography and Tomey EM-4000, and 0.969 be-tween Lenstar LS 900 and Tomey EM-4000. Conclusion: The devices with the closest results to each other were the Sirius and Tomey EM-4000 devices, with a statistically strong agreement. There was also a strong agreement between Sirius and Lenstar LS 900, although there was a 3.7-unit difference between them. Nevertheless, despite the strong agreements among these devices, because their CCT values varied statistically significantly, these devices should not be used interchangeably in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Central corneal thickness measurements in phakic, pseudophakic, and aphakic children with ultrasound pachymetry and different non-contact devices
    Majid Farvardin
    Anis Shamsi
    Amir Norouzpour
    Mohammad-Hasan Jalalpour
    [J]. International Ophthalmology, 2022, 42 : 65 - 72
  • [2] Central corneal thickness measurements in phakic, pseudophakic, and aphakic children with ultrasound pachymetry and different non-contact devices
    Farvardin, Majid
    Shamsi, Anis
    Norouzpour, Amir
    Jalalpour, Mohammad-Hasan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 42 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [3] Measurements of central corneal thickness and endothelial parameters with three different non-contact specular microscopy devices
    Cakici, Ozgur
    Karadag, Remzi
    Bayramlar, Huseyin
    Koyun, Efe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 37 (01) : 229 - 233
  • [4] Measurements of central corneal thickness and endothelial parameters with three different non-contact specular microscopy devices
    Ozgur Cakici
    Remzi Karadag
    Huseyin Bayramlar
    Efe Koyun
    [J]. International Ophthalmology, 2017, 37 : 229 - 233
  • [5] Comparison of Non-Contact Methods for the Measurement of Central Corneal Thickness
    Gorgun, Ebru
    Yenerel, Nursal Melda
    Dinc, Umut Asli
    Oncel, Banu
    Kucumen, Raciha Beril
    Oral, Deniz
    Ciftci, Ferda
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING, 2011, 42 (05) : 400 - 407
  • [6] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three different optical devices
    Ucer, Mehmet Baris
    Bozkurt, Erdinc
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 13
  • [7] Repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness measurements with a new handheld non-contact pachymeter
    Lawrenson, John G. G.
    Gill, Simranjit
    Masuid, Isra
    Rashid, Fardip
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2023, 43 (06) : 1524 - 1530
  • [8] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements of non-contact Tonoref III and two ultrasound pachymetry devices OcuScan RxP and SP-100
    Christodoulakis, Emmanouil V.
    Lazari, Katerina C.
    Karpathaki, Margarita N.
    Linardakis, Manolis
    Chliveros, Konstantinos G.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)
  • [9] Comparison of central corneal thickness estimated by an ultrasonic pachymeter and non-contact specular microscopy
    Cevik, Sadik Gorkem
    Duman, Rahmi
    Cevik, Mediha Tok
    Kivanc, Serta Argun
    Akova-Budak, Berna
    Perente, Irfan
    Duman, Resat
    [J]. ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2016, 79 (05) : 312 - 314
  • [10] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using three different imaging devices
    Kan, E.
    Duran, M.
    Yakar, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2023, 46 (06): : 589 - 595