Automating water quality analysis using ML and auto ML techniques

被引:21
|
作者
Prasad, D. Venkata Vara [1 ,3 ]
Kumar, P. Senthil [2 ,3 ]
Venkataramana, Lokeswari Y. [1 ,3 ]
Prasannamedha, G. [2 ,3 ]
Harshana, S. [1 ]
Srividya, S. Jahnavi [1 ]
Harrinei, K. [1 ]
Indraganti, Sravya [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar Coll Engn, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Chennai 603110, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar Coll Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Chennai 603110, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar Coll Engn, Ctr Excellence Water Res CEWAR, Chennai 603110, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Machine learning; AutoML; Water quality; SMOTE; TPOT; Water quality index; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.envres.2021.111720
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Generation of unprocessed effluents, municipal refuse, factory wastes, junking of compostable and noncompostable effluents has hugely contaminated nature-provided water bodies like rivers, lakes and ponds. Therefore, there is a necessity to look into the water standards before the usage. This is a problem that can greatly benefit from Artificial Intelligence (AI). Traditional methods require human inspection and is time consuming. Automatic Machine Learning (AutoML) facilities supply machine learning with push of a button, or, on a minimum level, ensure to retain algorithm execution, data pipelines, and code, generally, are kept from sight and are anticipated to be the stepping stone for normalising AI. However, it is still a field under research. This work aims to recognize the areas where an AutoML system falls short or outperforms a traditional expert system built by data scientists. Keeping this as the motive, this work dives into the Machine Learning (ML) algorithms for comparing AutoML and an expert architecture built by the authors for Water Quality Assessment to evaluate the Water Quality Index, which gives the general water quality, and the Water Quality Class, a term classified on the basis of the Water Quality Index. The results prove that the accuracy of AutoML and TPOT was 1.4 % higher than conventional ML techniques for binary class water data. For Multi class water data, AutoML was 0.5 % higher and TPOT was 0.6% higher than conventional ML techniques.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fission trajectory analysis using ML techniques
    Mukobaral, Yuta
    Chibal, Satoshi
    Fujiol, Kazuki
    Katabuchil, Tatsuya
    Ishizukal, Chikako
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEAVY-ION COLLISIONS AT NEAR-BARRIER ENERGIES, FUSION 2023, 2024, 306
  • [2] MOORING OPTIMIZATION USING ML TECHNIQUES
    Trubat, Pau
    Herrera, Adrian
    Molins, Climent
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2022 4TH INTERNATIONAL OFFSHORE WIND TECHNICAL CONFERENCE, IOWTC2022, 2022,
  • [3] Smart Monitoring and Water Quality Management in Aquaculture using IOT and ML
    Kirankumar, P.
    Keertana, G.
    Sivarao, S. U. Abhinash
    Vijaykumar, B.
    Shah, Sh Chetan
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, SMART AND GREEN TECHNOLOGIES (ICISSGT 2021), 2021, : 32 - 36
  • [4] Automating Tiny ML Intelligent Sensors DevOPS Using Microsoft Azure
    Vuppalapati, Chandrasekar
    Ilapakurti, Anitha
    Chillara, Karthik
    Kedari, Sharat
    Mamidi, Vanaja
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2020, : 2375 - 2384
  • [5] Predictive Analysis of Market trends in Agriculture using ML/AI Techniques
    Tetarwal, Vishwash
    Dashora, Kavya
    Selvamuthu, Dharmaraja
    2024 IEEE APPLIED SENSING CONFERENCE, APSCON, 2024,
  • [6] Using Auto-ML on Synthetic Point Cloud Generation
    Hottong, Moritz
    Sperling, Moritz
    Mueller, Christoph
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [7] Big Data Analysis Framework for Water Quality Indicators with Assimilation of IoT and ML
    Kimothi, Sanjeev
    Thapliyal, Asha
    Akram, Shaik Vaseem
    Singh, Rajesh
    Gehlot, Anita
    Mohamed, Heba G.
    Anand, Divya
    Ibrahim, Muhammad
    Noya, Irene Delgado
    ELECTRONICS, 2022, 11 (13)
  • [8] Analysis of crop prediction models using data analytics and ML techniques: a review
    Shingade, Sachin Dattatraya
    Mudhalwadkar, Rohini Prashant
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 83 (13) : 37813 - 37838
  • [9] Analysis of OSNR and Data Rate Selection Using ML Techniques for Optical Networks
    Vishwakarma, Sourabh
    Jeyachitra, R. K.
    2020 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEVICES, CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (ICDCS' 20), 2020, : 130 - 134
  • [10] Analysis of crop prediction models using data analytics and ML techniques: a review
    Sachin Dattatraya Shingade
    Rohini Prashant Mudhalwadkar
    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2024, 83 : 37813 - 37838