Consequences of ignoring variable and spatially autocorrelated detection probability in spatial capture-recapture

被引:19
|
作者
Moqanaki, Ehsan M. [1 ]
Milleret, Cyril [1 ]
Tourani, Mahdieh [1 ,2 ]
Dupont, Pierre [1 ]
Bischof, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Fac Environm Sci & Nat Resource Management, POB 5003, N-1432 As, Norway
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Wildlife Fish & Conservat Biol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Capture-recapture; Detection probability; Heterogeneity; Spatial autocorrelation; Varying effort; Wildlife monitoring; OCCUPANCY MODELS; HIERARCHICAL MODEL; POPULATION-DENSITY; HETEROGENEITY; SIZE; PERFORMANCE; INFERENCE; WILDLIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-021-01283-x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models are increasingly popular for analyzing wildlife monitoring data. SCR can account for spatial heterogeneity in detection that arises from individual space use (detection kernel), variation in the sampling process, and the distribution of individuals (density). However, unexplained and unmodeled spatial heterogeneity in detectability may remain due to cryptic factors, both intrinsic and extrinsic to the study system. This is the case, for example, when covariates coding for variable effort and detection probability in general are incomplete or entirely lacking. Objectives We identify how the magnitude and configuration of unmodeled, spatially variable detection probability influence SCR parameter estimates. Methods We simulated SCR data with spatially variable and autocorrelated detection probability. We then fitted an SCR model ignoring this variation to the simulated data and assessed the impact of model misspecification on inferences. Results Highly-autocorrelated spatial heterogeneity in detection probability (Moran's I = 0.85-0.96), modulated by the magnitude of the unmodeled heterogeneity, can lead to pronounced negative bias (up to 65%, or about 44-fold decrease compared to the reference scenario), reduction in precision (249% or 2.5-fold) and coverage probability of the 95% credible intervals associated with abundance estimates to 0. Conversely, at low levels of spatial autocorrelation (median Moran's I = 0), even severe unmodeled heterogeneity in detection probability did not lead to pronounced bias and only caused slight reductions in precision and coverage of abundance estimates. Conclusions Unknown and unmodeled variation in detection probability is liable to be the norm, rather than the exception, in SCR studies. We encourage practitioners to consider the impact that spatial autocorrelation in detectability has on their inferences and urge the development of SCR methods that can take structured, unknown or partially unknown spatial variability in detection probability into account.
引用
收藏
页码:2879 / 2895
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Consequences of ignoring variable and spatially autocorrelated detection probability in spatial capture-recapture
    Ehsan M. Moqanaki
    Cyril Milleret
    Mahdieh Tourani
    Pierre Dupont
    Richard Bischof
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36 : 2879 - 2895
  • [2] Modelling spatially autocorrelated detection probabilities in spatial capture-recapture using random effects
    Dey, Soumen
    Moqanaki, Ehsan
    Milleret, Cyril
    Dupont, Pierre
    Tourani, Mahdieh
    Bischof, Richard
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2023, 479
  • [3] Consequences of ignoring group association in spatial capture-recapture analysis
    Bischof, Richard
    Dupont, Pierre
    Milleret, Cyril
    Chipperfield, Joseph
    Royle, J. Andrew
    [J]. WILDLIFE BIOLOGY, 2020, 2020 (01)
  • [4] Spatial Capture-Recapture
    Russell, Robin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 78 (07): : 1319 - 1320
  • [5] Spatial Capture-Recapture Models
    Borchers, David
    Fewster, Rachel
    [J]. STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 31 (02) : 219 - 232
  • [6] Spatial capture-recapture for categorically marked populations with an application to genetic capture-recapture
    Augustine, Ben C.
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Murphy, Sean M.
    Chandler, Richard B.
    Cox, John J.
    Kelly, Marcella J.
    [J]. ECOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (04):
  • [7] Spatial and temporal variation in detection probability of plethodon salamanders using the robust capture-recapture design
    Bailey, LL
    Simons, TR
    Pollock, KH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2004, 68 (01): : 14 - 24
  • [8] A CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DESIGN ROBUST TO UNEQUAL PROBABILITY OF CAPTURE
    POLLOCK, KH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1982, 46 (03): : 752 - 757
  • [9] Estimating spatially variable and density-dependent survival using open-population spatial capture-recapture models
    Milleret, Cyril
    Dey, Soumen
    Dupont, Pierre
    Broseth, Henrik
    Turek, Daniel
    de Valpine, Perry
    Bischof, Richard
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2023, 104 (02)
  • [10] Compensatory heterogeneity in spatially explicit capture-recapture data
    Efford, M. G.
    Mowat, G.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2014, 95 (05) : 1341 - 1348