The greenhouse gas removal potential of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) to support the UK's net-zero emission target

被引:53
|
作者
Garcia-Freites, Samira [1 ,2 ]
Gough, Clair [1 ]
Roder, Mirjam [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Dept Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Promigas SA ESP, Ctr Invest & Innovat Energia & Gas CIIEG, Barranquilla, Colombia
[3] Aston Univ, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Energy & Bioprod Res Inst EBRI, Supergen Bioenergy Hub, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
来源
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY | 2021年 / 151卷
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS); Greenhouse gas removal (GGR); Net-zero emission target; Negative emissions; Biomass sustainability; Land-use; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; COMBUSTION POWER-PLANT; SHORT-ROTATION COPPICE; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; CO2; CAPTURE; WILLOW; PERFORMANCE; ENERGY; LAND; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106164
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The UK is the first major economy to legislate the reduction of all GHG emissions to net-zero. Greenhouse gas removal (GGR) approaches are likely to be required to support the 2050 net-zero target by offsetting residual emissions from 'hard-to-abate' sectors. Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is investigated as one technical solution for GGR. This research used process modelling and lifecycle assessment to identify the GGR potential of three BECCS supply chains. Results show that the BECCS supply chains have significant GGR potential with net-negative emissions as CO(2)e between 647 and 1137 kg MWh(-1). Emissions were compared per unit energy output, biomass and area required for each supply chain to assess the GGR potential and BECCS sustainability implications. The large-scale BECCS supply chain features robust technologies with high capacity factor. It produces the greatest electricity generation and annual GGR, however, demands large amounts of biomass raising potential sustainability issues. The medium-scale (CHP) BECCS provides the greatest GGR potential per energy due to its higher energy efficiency. Limitations are a low capacity factor, energy demand-supply balance and non-existent decentralised CCS infrastructure. The (hydrogen) BECCS supply chain is more versatile, producing hydrogen with the potential to support the decarbonisation of not just power, but heat and transport sectors. The GGR potential sits in the middle and has greater benefits from a biomass sustainability perspective, yet, hydrogen infrastructure is not established, and costs remain uncertain. The relative performance of alternative BECCS supply chains should consider direct links between CO2 removal and sustainable biomass and land use, as well as GGR potential.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The UK net-zero target: Insights into procedural justice for greenhouse gas removal
    O'Beirne, Patricia
    Battersby, Francesca
    Mallett, Amy
    Aczel, Miriam
    Makuch, Karen
    Workman, Mark
    Heap, Richard
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2020, 112 : 264 - 274
  • [2] Achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emission plastics by a circular carbon economy
    Meys, Raoul
    Kaetelhoen, Arne
    Bachmann, Marvin
    Winter, Benedikt
    Zibunas, Christian
    Suh, Sangwon
    Bardow, Andre
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2021, 374 (6563) : 71 - +
  • [3] Time-Resolved Cost Analysis of Natural Gas Power Plant Conversion to Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage to Support Net-Zero Emissions
    Sproul, Evan
    Barlow, Jay
    Quinn, Jason C.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (23) : 15338 - 15346
  • [4] The contribution of carbon capture and storage to Canada's net-zero plan
    Zhang, Kai
    Lau, Hon Chung
    Chen, Zhangxin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 404
  • [5] Carbon dioxide removal potential from decentralised bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and the relevance of operational choices
    Almena, Alberto
    Thornley, Patricia
    Chong, Katie
    Roder, Mirjam
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2022, 159
  • [6] Potential and goal conflicts in reverse auction design for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)
    Fridahl, Mathias
    Mollersten, Kenneth
    Lundberg, Liv
    Rickels, Wilfried
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2024, 36 (01)
  • [7] Potential for using municipal solid waste as a resource for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)
    Pour, Nasim
    Webley, Paul A.
    Cook, Peter J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2018, 68 : 1 - 15
  • [8] Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): Global potential, investment preferences, and deployment barriers
    Fridahl, Mathias
    Lehtveer, Mariliis
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 42 : 155 - 165
  • [9] Editorial: The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies in a Net-Zero Carbon Future
    Bui, Mai
    Gazzani, Matteo
    Pozo, Carlos
    Puxty, Graeme Douglas
    Soltani, Salman Masoudi
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 9
  • [10] A net-zero storyline for success? News media analysis of the social legitimacy of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in the United Kingdom
    Donnison, Caspar L.
    Trdlicova, Karolina
    Mohr, Alison
    Taylor, Gail
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2023, 102