Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Covert vs. Overt Emotional Face Processing in Dysphoria

被引:3
|
作者
Jaspers-Fayer, Fern [1 ]
Maffei, Antonio [2 ,3 ]
Goertzen, Jennifer [1 ]
Kleffner, Killian [1 ]
Coccaro, Ambra [2 ,3 ]
Sessa, Paola [2 ,3 ]
Liotti, Mario [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Psychol, Lab Affect & Dev Neurosci, Burnaby, BC, Canada
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Dev & Social Psychol, Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Padova Neurosci Ctr, Padua, Italy
来源
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 加拿大创新基金会;
关键词
ERPs; dysphoria; emotion; attention; faces; N170; depression; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; TIME-COURSE; COGNITIVE VULNERABILITY; THREATENING FACES; NEURAL MECHANISMS; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; SAD FACES; DEPRESSION; BRAIN; ERP;
D O I
10.3389/fnbeh.2022.920989
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
People at risk of developing clinical depression exhibit attentional biases for emotional faces. To clarify whether such effects occur at an early, automatic, or at a late, deliberate processing stage of emotional processing, the present study used high-density electroencephalography during both covert and overt processing of sad, fearful, happy, and neutral expressions in healthy participants with high dysphoria (n = 16) and with low dysphoria (n = 19). A state-of-the-art non-parametric permutation-based statistical approach was then used to explore the effects of emotion, attentional task demands, and group. Behaviorally, participants responded faster and more accurately when overtly categorizing happy faces and they were slower and less accurate when categorizing sad and fearful faces, independent of the dysphoria group. Electrophysiologically, in an early time-window (N170: 140-180 ms), there was a significant main effect for the dysphoria group, with greater negative voltage for the high vs. low dysphoria group over the left-sided temporo-occipital scalp. Furthermore, there was a significant group by emotional interaction, with the high dysphoria group displaying greater negative amplitude N170 for happy than fearful faces. Attentional task demands did not influence such early effects. In contrast, in an intermediate time-window (EPN: 200-400 ms) and in a late time-window (LPP: 500-750 ms) there were no significant main effects nor interactions involving the dysphoria Group. The LPP results paralleled the behavioral results, with greater LPP voltages for sad and fearful relative to happy faces only in the overt task, but similarly so in the two dysphoria groups. This study provides novel evidence that alterations in face processing in dysphoric individuals can be seen at the early stages of face perception, as indexed by the N170, although not in the form of a typical pattern of mood-congruent attentional bias. In contrast, intermediate (EPN) and late (LPP) stages of emotional face processing appear unaffected by dysphoria. Importantly, the early dysphoria effect appears to be independent of the top-down allocation of attention, further supporting the idea that dysphoria may influence a stage of automatic emotional appraisal. It is proposed that it may be a consequence of a shift from holistic to feature-based processing of facial expressions, or may be due to the influence of negative schemas acting as a negative context for emotional facial processing.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] EEG alpha band functional connectivity reveals distinct cortical dynamics for overt and covert emotional face processing
    Maffei, Antonio
    Coccaro, Ambra
    Jaspers-Fayer, Fern
    Goertzen, Jennifer
    Sessa, Paola
    Liotti, Mario
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [2] EEG alpha band functional connectivity reveals distinct cortical dynamics for overt and covert emotional face processing
    Antonio Maffei
    Ambra Coccaro
    Fern Jaspers-Fayer
    Jennifer Goertzen
    Paola Sessa
    Mario Liotti
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [3] Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Covert Versus Overt Processing of Happy, Fearful and Sad Facial Expressions
    Maffei, Antonio
    Goertzen, Jennifer
    Jaspers-Fayer, Fern
    Kleffner, Killian
    Sessa, Paola
    Liotti, Mario
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (07)
  • [4] OVERT VERSUS COVERT NEURAL PROCESSING OF EMOTIONAL FACES
    Sramko, Valery
    Asmaro, Deyar
    Liotti, Mario
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 47 : S61 - S61
  • [5] Overt vs. covert speed cameras in combination with delayed vs. immediate feedback to the offender
    Marciano, Hadas
    Setter, Pe'erly
    Norman, Joel
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2015, 79 : 231 - 240
  • [6] NEURAL DYNAMICS OF FAMILIAR FACE PERCEPTION: COVERT AND OVERT RECOGNITION
    Gongora, Daylin
    Castro-Laguardia, Ana
    Lage-Castellanos, Agustin
    Iglesias-Fuster, Jorge
    Gonzalez-Dalmau, Evelio
    Gonzalez, Eduardo
    Valdes-Sosa, Pedro
    Bobes, Maria
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 55 : S83 - S83
  • [7] EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS IN COVERT AND OVERT PROCESSING OF EMOTIONAL STIMULI
    Jaspers-Fayer, Fern E.
    Barrie, Jennifer N.
    Liotti, Mario
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 47 : S60 - S61
  • [8] The influence of directed covert attention on emotional face processing
    Brassen, Stefanie
    Gamer, Matthias
    Rose, Michael
    Buechel, Christian
    NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 50 (02) : 545 - 551
  • [9] Covert vs. Overt: Toward a More Nuanced Understanding of Sex Differences in Competition
    Heather E. Heying
    Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2022, 51 : 3273 - 3277
  • [10] Spatiotemporal dynamics of electrocorticographic high gamma activity during overt and covert word repetition
    Pei, Xiaomei
    Leuthardt, Eric C.
    Gaona, Charles M.
    Brunner, Peter
    Wolpaw, Jonathan R.
    Schalk, Gerwin
    NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 54 (04) : 2960 - 2972