Can we define a tolerable level of risk in food allergy? Report from a EuroPrevall/UK Food Standards Agency workshop

被引:45
|
作者
Madsen, C. B. [1 ]
Hattersley, S. [2 ]
Allen, K. J. [3 ]
Beyer, K. [4 ]
Chan, C. -H. [2 ]
Godefroy, S. B. [5 ]
Hodgson, R. [2 ]
Mills, E. N. C. [6 ]
Munoz-Furlong, A. [7 ]
Schnadt, S. [8 ]
Ward, R. [9 ]
Wickman, M. [10 ,11 ]
Crevel, R. [12 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Toxicol & Risk Assessment, Natl Food Inst, DK-2860 Soborg, Denmark
[2] Food Stand Agcy, Food Allergy Branch, London, England
[3] Univ Melbourne, Royal Childrens Hosp, Dept Paediat, Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Charite, Med Ctr, Dept Paediat Pneumol & Immunol, Berlin, Germany
[5] Hlth Canada, Food Directorate, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] AFRC, Inst Food Res, Norwich NR4 7UA, Norfolk, England
[7] Food Allergy & Anaphylaxis Network, Fairfax, VA USA
[8] Deutscher Allergie & Asthmabund, Monchengladbach, Germany
[9] PepsiCo Int, Leicester, Leics, England
[10] Karolinska Inst, Sachs Childrens Hosp, Stockholm, Sweden
[11] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[12] Unilever Safety & Environm Assurance Ctr, Bedford, England
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY | 2012年 / 42卷 / 01期
关键词
EuroPrevall; food allergy; risk assessment; stakeholders; tolerable risk; UK Food Standards Agency; PEANUT; ANAPHYLAXIS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03868.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background There is an emerging consensus that, as with other risks in society, zero risk for food-allergic people is not a realistic or attainable option. Food allergy challenge data and new risk assessment methods offer the opportunity to develop quantitative limits for unintended allergenic ingredients which can be used in risk-based approaches. However, a prerequisite to their application is defining a tolerable level of risk. This requires a value judgement and is ultimately a ` societal' decision that has to involve all relevant stakeholders. Objective The aim of the workshop was to bring together key representatives from the stakeholders (regulators, food industry, clinical researchers and patients), and for the first time ever discuss the definition of a tolerable level of risk with regard to allergic reactions to food. Results The discussions revealed a consensus that zero risk was not a realistic option and that it is essential to address the current lack of agreed action levels for cross-contamination with allergens if food allergen management practice is to be improved. The discussions also indicated that it was difficult to define and quantify a tolerable level of risk, although both the clinical and the industry groups tried to do so. A consensus emerged that doing nothing was not a viable option, and there was a strong desire to take action to improve the current situation. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance Two concrete actions were suggested: (1) Action levels should be derived from the data currently available. Different scenarios should be examined and further developed in an iterative process. On the basis of this work, a tolerable level of risk should be proposed. (2) ` One-dose' clinical trial with a low challenge dose should be performed in multiple centres to provide additional information about the general applicability of dose-distribution models and help validate the threshold levels derived.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 37
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] UK Food Standards Agency Workshop Report: carbohydrate and cardiovascular risk
    Peacock, Emma
    Stanley, John
    Calder, Philip C.
    Jebb, Susan A.
    Thies, Frank
    Seal, Chris J.
    Woodside, Jayne V.
    Sanders, Tom A. B.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2010, 103 (11) : 1688 - 1694
  • [2] Folate bioavailability: UK Food Standards Agency workshop report
    Sanderson, P
    McNulty, H
    Mastroiacovo, P
    McDowell, IFW
    Melse-Boonstra, A
    Finglas, PM
    Gregory, JF
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2003, 90 (02) : 473 - 479
  • [3] Iron bioavailability: UK Food Standards Agency workshop report
    Singh, Mamta
    Sanderson, Peter
    Hurrell, Richard F.
    Fairweather-Tait, Susan J.
    Geissler, Catherine
    Prentice, Ann
    Beard, John L.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2006, 96 (05) : 985 - 990
  • [4] UK Food Standards Agency α-linolenic acid workshop report
    Sanderson, P
    Finnegan, YE
    Williams, CM
    Calder, PC
    Burdge, GC
    Wootton, SA
    Griffin, BA
    Millward, DJ
    Pegge, NC
    Bemelmans, WJE
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2002, 88 (05) : 573 - 579
  • [5] UK Food Standards Agency Workshop Report: Diet and Immune Function
    Sanderson, Peter
    Elsom, Rachel L.
    Kirkpatrick, Verity
    Calder, Philip C.
    Woodside, Jayne V.
    Williams, Elizabeth A.
    Rink, Lothar
    Fairweather-Tait, Susan
    Ivory, Kamal
    Cantorna, Margherita
    Watzl, Bernhard
    Stone, Elaine M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2010, 103 (11) : 1684 - 1687
  • [6] Functional markers of selenium status:: UK Food Standards Agency workshop report
    Elsom, Rachel
    Sanderson, Peter
    Hesketh, John E.
    Jackson, Malcolm J.
    Fairweather-Tait, Susan J.
    Akesson, Bjorn
    Handy, Jean
    Arthur, John R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2006, 96 (05) : 980 - 984
  • [7] UK Food Standards Agency cis-monounsaturated fatty acid workshop report
    Sanderson, P
    Gill, JMR
    Packard, CJ
    Sanders, TAB
    Vessby, B
    Williams, CM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2002, 88 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [8] Food allergy - science and policy needs - The UK Food Standards Agency Research Programme
    Buck, Joelle
    Hattersley, Sue
    Kimber, Ian
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY, 2010, 278 (03) : 319 - 325
  • [9] UK's food standards agency will report to health minister
    Masood, E
    [J]. NATURE, 1998, 391 (6665) : 313 - 313
  • [10] UK's food standards agency will report to health minister
    Ehsan Masood
    [J]. Nature, 1998, 391 : 313 - 313