Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness

被引:117
|
作者
Cascio, CJ [1 ]
Sathian, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE | 2001年 / 21卷 / 14期
关键词
human; perception; somatosensory; touch; finger; texture; gratings; roughness; temporal frequency; psychophysics; discrimination; magnitude estimation;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-14-05289.2001
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Optimal perception of surface roughness requires lateral movement between skin and surface, suggesting the importance of temporal cues. The roughness of periodic gratings is affected by changing either inter-element spacing (groove width, G) or element width (ridge width, R). Peripheral neural responses to gratings depend quantitatively on a spatial variable, G, and a temporal variable, grating temporal frequency (F-t), with changes in R acting indirectly through concomitant changes in F-t. We investigated, psychophysically, the contribution of temporal cues to human tactile perception of roughness, using gratings varying in either R or G. Gratings were scanned across the immobile fingerpad with controlled movement speed (S) and contact force. in one experiment, we found that roughness magnitude estimates depended on both G and F-t. In a second experiment, discrimination of the roughness of gratings varying in either R or G was affected by manipulating F-t. Overall, the effect of G on roughness judgments was much stronger than that of F-t, probably explaining why many previous studies using surfaces that varied only in inter-element spacing led to the conclusion that temporal factors play no role in roughness perception. However, the perceived roughness of R-varying gratings was determined by F-t and not spatial variables. Roughness judgments were influenced by G and F-t in a manner entirely consistent with predicted afferent response rates. Thus perceived roughness, like peripheral afferent responses, depends in part on temporal variables.
引用
收藏
页码:5289 / 5296
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tactile perception of auditory roughness
    Bernard, Corentin
    Kronland-Martinet, Richard
    Fery, Madeline
    Ystad, Solvi
    Thoret, Etienne
    [J]. JASA EXPRESS LETTERS, 2022, 2 (12):
  • [2] NEURAL CODING OF TACTILE TEXTURE - COMPARISON OF SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL MECHANISMS FOR ROUGHNESS PERCEPTION
    CONNOR, CE
    JOHNSON, KO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1992, 12 (09): : 3414 - 3426
  • [3] Human perception of pneumatic tactile cues
    Kim, Yeongmi
    Oakley, Ian
    Ryu, Jeha
    [J]. ADVANCED ROBOTICS, 2008, 22 (08) : 807 - 828
  • [4] The Tactile Distance Aftereffect Transfers to Roughness Perception
    Jeschke, Michaela
    Drewing, Knut
    Azarion, Elena
    [J]. 2023 IEEE WORLD HAPTICS CONFERENCE, WHC, 2023, : 8 - 13
  • [5] Tactile Roughness Perception of Virtual Gratings by Electrovibration
    Isleyen, Aykut
    Vardar, Yasemin
    Basdogan, Cagatay
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HAPTICS, 2020, 13 (03) : 562 - 570
  • [6] Temporal frequency affects perceived tactile roughness
    Cascio, C
    Sathian, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, : 40 - 41
  • [7] Surface Stickiness Perception by Auditory, Tactile, and Visual Cues
    Lee, Hyungeol
    Lee, Eunsil
    Jung, Jiye
    Kim, Junsuk
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [8] Contribution of tactile and interoceptive cues to the perception of the direction of gravity
    Trousselard, M
    Barraud, PA
    Nougier, V
    Raphel, C
    Cian, C
    [J]. COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 20 (03): : 355 - 362
  • [9] Tactile Perception of Vellum Quantified by Friction and Surface Roughness
    Samuel D. Leventini
    Brian S. Martin-Gutierrez
    Abhishek Kumar
    Asa Simon Mittman
    Susan M. Kim
    Ashlie Martini
    [J]. Tribology Letters, 2022, 70
  • [10] Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants
    Koijck, Lara A.
    Toet, Alexander
    Van Erp, Jan B. F.
    [J]. PEERJ, 2015, 3