The Consistency Analysis between Protection Ability and Solvency Regulation of Nonlife Insurance in China

被引:0
|
作者
Su, Fang [1 ]
Xiong Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Non-life Insurance Company; Protection Ability; Solvency; C-ROSS; SIZE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Insurance Protection Ability is the core in this article. The index of protection ability for each insurance company is got basing on multi-index comprehensive assessment model of protection ability for nonlife insurance company. Then regression analysis are made for some many times between index of protection ability and solvency margin, even with the detailed index for different level of solvency margin. All research results are showed that, the solvency regulation is run counter to the guide of protection ability, especially for C-ROSS, which is the core in the Chinese insurance regulation system. Those nonlife insurance company which has a little higher protection ability need more minimum capitals and has a little lower solvency margin. Such solvency regulation system would not only stop nonlife insurance company improving their protection ability, but also make them confused about the development direction. From the detailed regression analysis step by step, the deep reason are found. C-ROSS was oriented by risk only, while it didn't take the different importance between insurance business and investment business into account. Then, some suggestions are provided in order to reform and adjust C-ROSS system. For example, we can distribute some weights to different risk and different risk capital according with their tightness with insurance business. The weight is a little low if the risk or debt has a strong tightness relationship with insurance business, and the weight is a little high if the capital has a strong tightness relationship with insurance business, So that, C-ROSS would keep the same direction with protection ability regulation. It would play a more important role in the "releasing the front and focusing the end" regulation system, and accelerate insurance companies returning back to protection.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 130
页数:21
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Board structure and corporate risk taking in the UK financial sector
    Akbar, Saeed
    Kharabsheh, Buthiena
    Poletti-Hughes, Jannine
    Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Ali
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 50 : 101 - 110
  • [2] CHEN W H., 2015, CHINA FINANCE, P9
  • [3] CHEN X J., 2017, CHINA FINANCE, P45
  • [4] CHENG W S, 2018, CHINA FINANCE, P73
  • [5] CHU L P, J YUNNAN FINANCE TRA
  • [6] Boards: Does one size fit all?
    Coles, Jeffrey L.
    Daniel, Naveen D.
    Naveen, Lalitha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 87 (02) : 329 - 356
  • [7] Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia
    Fan, JPH
    Wong, TJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2002, 33 (03): : 401 - 425
  • [8] The Implications of the China Risk-Oriented Solvency System on the Life Insurance Market
    Fung, Derrick W. H.
    Jou, David
    Shao, Ai Ju
    Yeh, Jason J. H.
    [J]. GENEVA PAPERS ON RISK AND INSURANCE-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2018, 43 (04): : 615 - 632
  • [9] Hu Y H, 2012, STAT RES, V29, P26
  • [10] JIANG Z Z, 2009, INSURANCE STUDIES, P29