Tracing and building up environmental justice considerations in the urban ecosystem service literature: A systematic review

被引:67
|
作者
Calderon-Argelich, Amalia [1 ]
Benetti, Stefania [2 ]
Anguelovski, Isabelle [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Connolly, James J. T. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Langemeyer, Johannes [1 ,6 ]
Baro, Francesc [1 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona UAB, Inst Environm Sci & Technol ICTA, Edifici ICTA ICP,Carrer Columnes S-N, Cerdanyola Del Valles 08193, Spain
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Methods & Models Econ, Terr & Finance MEMOTEF, Via Castro Laurenziano 9, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[3] Hosp del Mar Med Res Inst IMIM, Carrer Doctor Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[4] Inst Catalana Recerca & Estudis Avancats ICRE, Passeig Lluis Co 23, Barcelona 08010, Spain
[5] Univ British Columbia, Sch Community & Reg Planning, 433-6333 Mem Rd, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Humboldt Univ, Dept Geog, Berlin, Germany
[7] Vrije Univ Brussel VUB, Dept Geog, Pl Laan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[8] Vrije Univ Brussel VUB, Dept Sociol, Pl Laan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Green spaces; Urban green infrastructure; Cities; Trade-offs; Equity; Environmental benefits; CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; GREEN SPACE; POLITICAL ECOLOGY; TRADE-OFFS; POVERTY ALLEVIATION; CO-BENEFITS; EQUITY; VALUATION; VALUES; CITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104130
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The concept of ecosystem services (ES) has mainstreamed as an interdisciplinary framework in the urban sustainability and resilience agenda. While the uptake of ES in urban areas is deeply entangled with multiple values, trade-offs, institutions, management and planning approaches, there is still a lack of a comprehensive and systematic framework to address environmental justice (EJ) in urban ES assessments. This article presents a systematic literature review to examine what factors are critical for the effective inclusion of an EJ lens in urban ES appraisals. More specifically, we assessed how distributional, procedural and recognitional EJ dimensions have been addressed, and in relation to which types of urban ES. Our results reveal that EJ considerations are currently focused on the (un)equal distribution of ES and the associated green and blue infrastructure with regard to socioeconomic groups, with special attention to income and race/ethnicity as the main mechanisms of social stratification. There is also a predominant focus on regulating and cultural ES, analyzing their role on resilience and adaptive capacity on one hand, and recreational values, social cohesion and place-making on the other. In this review, we also evaluate the interconnected dimensions of justice and their constraints, and lay out pathways for new research into intersectional and restorative approaches to justice in ES assessments. Finally, we interrogate what the role of urban ES-based planning might be in making more inclusive and just cities and explore its implications for policy and practice.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Justice in access to urban ecosystem services: A critical review of the literature
    Haque, Md. Nazmul
    Sharifi, Ayyoob
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 67
  • [2] Ecosystem service flows: A systematic literature review of marine systems
    Chalkiadakis, Charis
    Drakou, Evangelia G.
    Kraak, Menno-Jan
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 54
  • [3] Educational Practice in Education for Environmental Justice: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Guevara-Herrero, Irene
    Bravo-Torija, Beatriz
    Perez-Martin, Jose Manuel
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [4] Who are marginalized in accessing urban ecosystem services? A systematic literature review
    Haque, Md. Nazmul
    Sharifi, Ayyoob
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2024, 144
  • [5] Indicators for quantifying environmental building performance: A systematic literature review
    Maslesa, Esmir
    Jensen, Per Anker
    Birkved, Morten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2018, 19 : 552 - 560
  • [6] Ecosystem service delivery by urban agriculture and green infrastructure-a systematic review
    Evans, D. L.
    Falagan, N.
    Hardman, C. A.
    Kourmpetli, S.
    Liu, L.
    Mead, B. R.
    Davies, J. A. C.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 54
  • [7] Vegetation-based ecosystem service delivery in urban landscapes: A systematic review
    Stroud, Sebastian
    Peacock, Julie
    Hassall, Christopher
    [J]. BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2022, 61 : 82 - 101
  • [8] Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: A Systematic Literature Review
    Wadichar, Rahul Krushnaji
    Manusmare, Prashant
    Burghate, Mukul Abasaheb
    [J]. VISION-THE JOURNAL OF BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE, 2024, 28 (02) : 143 - 156
  • [9] Understanding biodiversity-ecosystem service relationships in urban areas: A comprehensive literature review
    Schwarz, Nina
    Moretti, Marco
    Bugalho, Miguel N.
    Davies, Zoe G.
    Haase, Dagmar
    Hack, Jochen
    Hof, Angela
    Melero, Yolanda
    Pett, Tristan J.
    Knapp, Sonja
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 27 : 161 - 171
  • [10] Urban Governance and refugees: a systematic literature review A systematic literature review
    Palacios, Rosiane A.
    Luciano, Edimara M.
    Pereira, Gabriela V.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, DGO 2024, 2024, : 341 - 351