Effects of consumer characteristics on their acceptance of online shopping: Comparisons among different product types

被引:126
|
作者
Lian, Jiunn-Woei
Lin, Tzu-Ming
机构
[1] Nanhua Univ, Dept Informat Management, Chiayi 622, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cent Univ, Dept Informat Management, Jhongli 32001, Taoyuan County, Taiwan
关键词
online shopping; consumer characteristics; product types;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous electronic commerce (EC) studies have found that consumer characteristics are important when considering issues related to the acceptance of online shopping. However, most studies have focused on a single product or similar products. The effects of different product types have been relatively neglected. Previous studies have limited the generalizability of their results to a few products at best. To overcome this limitation, the purpose of this study was to explore the effects of different product types. The Internet product and service classification grid proposed by Peterson, Balasubramanian and Bronnenberg (Peterson, R. A., Balasubramanian, S., & Bronnenberg, B. J. (1997). Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 329-346) was employed to examine the effects of consumer characteristic differences on online shopping acceptance in the context of different products and services. A survey-based approach was employed to investigate the research questions. Regression analysis demonstrated that the determinants of online shopping acceptance differ among product or service types. Additionally, personal innovativeness of information technology (PIIT), perceived Web security, personal privacy concerns, and product involvement can influence consumer acceptance of online shopping, but their influence varies according to product types. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 65
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Different Effects of Provider Recommendations and Consumer Reviews on Consumers' Shopping Efficiency for Different Product Types
    Li, Xin
    Liu, Jing
    Zhang, Fangfang
    [J]. 2016 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2016,
  • [2] Shopping Online - Determining Consumer Acceptance of Online Shops
    Brecht, Franziska
    Schaefer, Kerstin
    Baumann, Annika
    Guenther, Oliver
    [J]. AMCIS 2011 PROCEEDINGS, 2011,
  • [3] Online grocery shopping in Thailand: Consumer acceptance and usage behavior
    Driediger, Fabian
    Bhatiasevi, Veera
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2019, 48 : 224 - 237
  • [4] Online consumer retention: contingent effects of online shopping habit and online shopping experience
    Khalifa, Mohamed
    Liu, Vanessa
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2007, 16 (06) : 780 - 792
  • [5] CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ONLINE SHOPPING: A STUDY IN HUNGARY
    Nagy, Szabolcs
    Hajdu, Noemi
    [J]. AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC, 2021, 23 (56) : 155 - 173
  • [6] Exploring the Effects of "What" (Product) and "Where" (Website) Characteristics on Online Shopping Behavior
    Mallapragada, Girish
    Chandukala, Sandeep R.
    Liu, Qing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2016, 80 (02) : 21 - 38
  • [7] Consumer acceptance of online display advertising - the effects of ad characteristics and attitude toward online advertising
    Odoom, Priscilla Teika
    Narteh, Bedman
    Odoom, Raphael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERNET MARKETING AND ADVERTISING, 2022, 16 (04) : 317 - 343
  • [8] Effects of consumer characteristics and product presentations on online apparel impulse buying
    Chen-Yu, Jessie H.
    Kincade, Doris H.
    Rhee, YoungJu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL FASHION MARKETING, 2022, 13 (03) : 205 - 220
  • [9] Costs and factory comparisons of different energy types for the consumer
    Gossow
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT DES VEREINES DEUTSCHER INGENIEURE, 1930, 74 : 1030 - 1031
  • [10] EXPLORING CONSUMER’S ONLINE SHOPPING BEHAVIOR FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL
    Tang L.-L.
    Tsai C.-T.
    Lee Y.-H.
    [J]. Journal of Quality, 2021, 28 (06): : 379 - 412