Quantification of aerosol dispersal from suspected aerosol-generating procedures

Background Oxygen-delivering modalities like humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIV) are suspected of generating aerosols that may contribute to transmission of disease such as coronavirus disease 2019. We sought to assess if these modalities lead to increased aerosol dispersal compared to the use of non-humidified low-flow nasal cannula oxygen treatment (LFNC). Methods Aerosol dispersal from 20 healthy volunteers using HFNC, LFNC and NW oxygen treatment was measured in a controlled chamber. We investigated effects related to coughing and using a surgical face mask in combination with the oxygen delivering modalities. An aerodynamic particle sizer measured aerosol particles (APS3321, 0.3-20 mu m) directly in front of the subjects, while a mesh of smaller particle sensors (SPS30, 0.3-10 mu m) was distributed in the test chamber. Results Non-productive coughing led to significant increases in particle dispersal close to the face when using LFNC and HFNC but not when using NIV. HFNC or NW did not lead to a statistically significant increase in aerosol dispersal compared to LFNC. With non-productive cough in a room without air changes, there was a significant drop in particle levels between 100 cm and 180 cm from the subjects. Conclusions Our results indicate that using HFNC and NW does not lead to increased aerosol dispersal compared to low-flow oxygen treatment, except in rare cases. For a subject with non-productive cough, NW with double-limb circuit and non-vented mask may be a favourable choice to reduce the risk for aerosol spread.