Stratified neural networks in a time-to-event setting

被引:3
|
作者
Kuruc, Fabrizio [1 ,2 ]
Binder, Harald [1 ,2 ]
Hess, Moritz [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Fac Med, Inst Med Biometry & Stat, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, Freiburg, Germany
关键词
prediction; deep learning; neural networks; survival; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS ASSUMPTION; SURVIVAL; CLASSIFICATION; PREDICTION; SIGNATURE; MODELS; POWER;
D O I
10.1093/bib/bbab392
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Deep neural networks are frequently employed to predict survival conditional on omics-type biomarkers, e.g., by employing the partial likelihood of Cox proportional hazards model as loss function. Due to the generally limited number of observations in clinical studies, combining different data sets has been proposed to improve learning of network parameters. However, if baseline hazards differ between the studies, the assumptions of Cox proportional hazards model are violated. Based on high dimensional transcriptome profiles from different tumor entities, we demonstrate how using a stratified partial likelihood as loss function allows for accounting for the different baseline hazards in a deep learning framework. Additionally, we compare the partial likelihood with the ranking loss, which is frequently employed as loss function in machine learning approaches due to its seemingly simplicity. Using RNA-seq data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) we show that use of stratified loss functions leads to an overall better discriminatory power and lower prediction error compared to their non-stratified counterparts. We investigate which genes are identified to have the greatest marginal impact on prediction of survival when using different loss functions. We find that while similar genes are identified, in particular known prognostic genes receive higher importance from stratified loss functions. Taken together, pooling data from different sources for improved parameter learning of deep neural networks benefits largely from employing stratified loss functions that consider potentially varying baseline hazards. For easy application, we provide PyTorch code for stratified loss functions and an explanatory Jupyter notebook in a GitHub repository.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Time-to-Event Prediction with Neural Networks and Cox Regression
    Kvamme, Havard
    Borgan, Ornulf
    Scheel, Ida
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2019, 20
  • [2] Time-to-event prediction with neural networks and cox regression
    Kvamme, Havard
    Borgan, Ornulf
    Scheel, Ida
    [J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2019, 20
  • [3] Survival neural networks for time-to-event prediction in longitudinal study
    Jianfei Zhang
    Lifei Chen
    Yanfang Ye
    Gongde Guo
    Rongbo Chen
    Alain Vanasse
    Shengrui Wang
    [J]. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2020, 62 : 3727 - 3751
  • [4] Survival neural networks for time-to-event prediction in longitudinal study
    Zhang, Jianfei
    Chen, Lifei
    Ye, Yanfang
    Guo, Gongde
    Chen, Rongbo
    Vanasse, Alain
    Wang, Shengrui
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2020, 62 (09) : 3727 - 3751
  • [5] Calibration and Uncertainty in Neural Time-to-Event Modeling
    Chapfuwa, Paidamoyo
    Tao, Chenyang
    Li, Chunyuan
    Khan, Irfan
    Chandross, Karen J.
    Pencina, Michael J.
    Carin, Lawrence
    Henao, Ricardo
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2023, 34 (04) : 1666 - 1680
  • [6] Heterogeneous treatment effects in stratified clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints
    Beisel, Christina
    Benner, Axel
    Kunz, Christina
    Kopp-Schneider, Annette
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 59 (03) : 511 - 530
  • [7] Investigating the appropriateness of different concordance measures in a time-to-event setting
    Caetano, Samantha-Jo
    Pond, Gregory
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2020, 19 (06) : 763 - 775
  • [8] Time-to-Event Analysis
    Tolles, Juliana
    Lewis, Roger J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (10): : 1046 - 1047
  • [9] Time-to-event analysis
    Debanne, SM
    Rowland, DY
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 55 (03) : 458 - 459
  • [10] Time-to-event analysis with artificial neural networks: An integrated analytical and rule-based study for breast cancer
    Lisboa, Paulo J. G.
    Etchells, Terence A.
    Jarman, Ian H.
    Aung, M. S. Hane
    Chabaud, Sylvie
    Bachelot, Thomas
    Perol, David
    Gargi, Therese
    Bourdes, Valerie
    Bonnevay, Stephane
    Negrier, Sylvie
    [J]. NEURAL NETWORKS, 2008, 21 (2-3) : 414 - 426