A Blind Test of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis

被引:13
|
作者
Holliday, Vance [1 ,2 ]
Surovell, Todd [3 ]
Johnson, Eileen [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Anthropol, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Geosci, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Univ Wyoming, Dept Anthropol, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[4] Texas Tech Univ Museum, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 07期
关键词
SOUTHERN HIGH-PLAINS; LUBBOCK LAKE SITE; EXTRATERRESTRIAL IMPACT; MURRAY SPRINGS; INDEPENDENT EVALUATION; BLACK MATS; BOUNDARY; NANODIAMONDS; EVENT; LAYER;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0155470
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis (YDIH) states that North America was devastated by some sort of extraterrestrial event similar to 12,800 calendar years before present. Two fundamental questions persist in the debate over the YDIH: Can the results of analyses for purported impact indicators be reproduced? And are the indicators unique to the lower YD boundary (YDB), i.e., similar to 12.8k cal yrs BP? A test reported here presents the results of analyses that address these questions. Two different labs analyzed identical splits of samples collected at, above, and below the similar to 12.8ka zone at the Lubbock Lake archaeological site (LL) in northwest Texas. Both labs reported similar variation in levels of magnetic micrograins (>300 mg/kg >12.8ka and <11.5ka, but <150 mg/kg 12.8ka to 11.5ka). Analysis for magnetic microspheres in one split, reported elsewhere, produced very low to nonexistent levels throughout the section. In the other split, reported here, the levels of magnetic microspherules and nanodiamonds are low or nonexistent at, below, and above the YDB with the notable exception of a sample <11,500 cal years old. In that sample the claimed impact proxies were recovered at abundances two to four orders of magnitude above that from the other samples. Reproducibility of at least some analyses are problematic. In particular, no standard criteria exist for identification of magnetic spheres. Moreover, the purported impact proxies are not unique to the YDB.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis: A requiem
    Pinter, Nicholas
    Scott, Andrew C.
    Daulton, Tyrone L.
    Podoll, Andrew
    Koeberl, Christian
    Anderson, R. Scott
    Ishman, Scott E.
    [J]. EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2011, 106 (3-4) : 247 - 264
  • [2] The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis: a critical review
    van Hoesel, Annelies
    Hoek, Wim Z.
    Pennock, Gillian M.
    Drury, Martyn R.
    [J]. QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2014, 83 : 95 - 114
  • [3] The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis: Review of the impact evidence
    Sweatman, Martin B.
    [J]. EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2021, 218
  • [4] Age models and the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis
    Blaauw, Maarten
    Holliday, Vance T.
    Gill, Jacquelyn L.
    Nicoll, Kathleen
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (34) : E2240 - E2240
  • [5] The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis: a cosmic catastrophe
    Holliday, Vance T.
    Surovell, Todd
    Meltzer, David J.
    Grayson, Donald K.
    Boslough, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUATERNARY SCIENCE, 2014, 29 (06) : 515 - 530
  • [6] Comprehensive refutation of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis (YDIH)
    Holliday, Vance T.
    Daulton, Tyrone L.
    Bartlein, Patrick J.
    Boslough, Mark B.
    Breslawski, Ryan P.
    Fisher, Abigail E.
    Jorgeson, Ian A.
    Scott, Andrew C.
    Koeberl, Christian
    Marlon, Jennifer R.
    Severinghaus, Jeffrey
    Petaev, Michail I.
    Claeys, Philippe
    [J]. EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2023, 247
  • [7] An independent evaluation of the Younger Dryas extraterrestrial impact hypothesis
    Surovell, Todd A.
    Holliday, Vance T.
    Gingerich, Joseph A. M.
    Ketron, Caroline
    Haynes, C. Vance, Jr.
    Hilman, Ilene
    Wagner, Daniel P.
    Johnson, Eileen
    Claeys, Philippe
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (43) : 18155 - 18158
  • [8] Premature rejection in science: The case of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis
    Powell, James Lawrence
    [J]. SCIENCE PROGRESS, 2022, 105 (01)
  • [9] Accumulation of impact markers in desert wetlands and implications for the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis
    Pigati, Jeffrey S.
    Latorre, Claudio
    Rech, Jason A.
    Betancourt, Julio L.
    Martinez, Katherine E.
    Budahn, James R.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (19) : 7208 - 7212
  • [10] Comprehensive analysis of nanodiamond evidence relating to the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis
    Daulton, Tyrone L.
    Amari, Sachiko
    Scott, Andrew C.
    Hardiman, Mark
    Pinter, Nicholas
    Anderson, R. Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUATERNARY SCIENCE, 2017, 32 (01) : 7 - 34