Development and Validation of a Visual Symptom-Specific Patient-Reported Outcomes Instrument for Adults With Cataract Intraocular Lens Implants

被引:11
|
作者
Lasch, Kathryn [1 ]
Marcus, James C. [2 ]
Seo, Caroline [2 ]
McCarrier, Kelly P. [2 ]
Wirth, R. J. [3 ]
Patrick, Donald L. [4 ]
O'Riordan, John F. [5 ]
Stasaski, Renea [5 ]
机构
[1] Pharmerit Open Hlth Co, Newton, MA USA
[2] Pharmerit Open Hlth Co, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Vector Psychometr Grp, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Alcon Labs Inc, Ft Worth, TX USA
关键词
PRO INSTRUMENTS; VALIDITY; AGREEMENT; QUALITY; VISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2021.10.023
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To develop a patient-reported outcome measure for capturing visual and ocular symptoms before and after implantation of intraocular lenses (IOLs) for treatment of cataracts. DESIGN: Questionnaire development and validation study. METHODS: The Questionnaire for Visual Disturbances (QUVID) was developed based on a literature and instrument review; 13 clinician interviews among ophthalmologists in the United States and Europe; and 67 hybrid qualitative patient interviews among adult patients in the United States and Australia before and/or after monofocal, traditional multifocal, or trifocal IOL implantation. Assessment of the QUVID's psychometric properties was conducted via a noninterventional cross-sectional study of previously treated cataract patients in the United States, Canada, and Australia (n = 150), and assessment of ability to detect meaningful change via 2 pivotal US clinical trials among patients with trifocal or extended vision IOL compared with monofocal IOL controls (n = 457). RESULTS: The QUVID includes subitems about the bothersomeness of 7 visual symptoms: starburst, halo, glare, hazy vision, blurred vision, double vision, and dark areas. The postoperative version contains 1 item asking the respondents whether their symptoms bothered them enough to want another surgery, if the IOL was the cause. CONCLUSIONS: The QUVID was reviewed by the US Food and Drug Administration and found appropriate as a fit-for-purpose measure, demonstrating requisite evidence for content validity, construct validity, reliability, and ability to detect change. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 103
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using a symptom-specific instrument to measure patient-reported daily functioning in patients with cancer
    Shi, Qiuling
    Mendoza, Tito R.
    Wang, Xin Shelley
    Cleeland, Charles S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 67 : 83 - 90
  • [2] Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Symptoms Associated with Cataract Surgery and Intraocular Lens Implants
    Hays, Ron D.
    Macrae, Scott
    Holladay, Jack
    Tarver, Michelle E.
    Lum, Flora
    Stark, Walter
    Weidmer, Beverly
    Kumar, Nisha
    Lau, George
    Nguyen, Tieuvi
    Schallhorn, Steven
    Eydelman, Malvina
    Masket, Samuel
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 130 (07) : 715 - 725
  • [3] Visual and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens Compared with Those of a Monofocal Intraocular Lens
    Modi, Satish
    Lehmann, Robert
    Maxwell, Andrew
    Solomon, Kerry
    Cionni, Robert
    Thompson, Vance
    Horn, Jeffrey
    Caplan, Michael
    Fisher, Bret
    Hu, Jerry G.
    Yeu, Elizabeth
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 128 (02) : 197 - 207
  • [4] Patient-Reported Outcomes of Visual Disturbances with a Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhu, Dagny
    Karki, Suyen
    Dhariwal, Mukesh
    Soini, Erkki
    Asseburg, Christian
    OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2025, 14 (02) : 379 - 390
  • [5] Development and validation of a primary sclerosing cholangitis-specific patient-reported outcomes instrument: The PSC PRO
    Younossi, Zobair M.
    Afendy, Arian
    Stepanova, Maria
    Racila, Andrei
    Nader, Fatema
    Gomel, Rachel
    Safer, Ricky
    Lenderking, William R.
    Skalicky, Anne
    Kleinman, Leah
    Myers, Robert P.
    Subramanian, G. Mani
    McHutchison, John G.
    Levy, Cynthia
    Bowlus, Christopher L.
    Kowdley, Kris
    Muir, Andrew J.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 68 (01) : 155 - 165
  • [6] A comparison of patient-reported outcomes from an reported apodized diffractive intraocular lens and a conventional monofocal intraocular lens
    Lehmann, Robert
    Waycaster, Curtis
    Hileman, Kendra
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2006, 22 (12) : 2591 - 2602
  • [7] Development and psychometric validation of the Nausea/vomiting symptom assessment patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for adults with secondary hyperparathyroidism
    McHorney C.A.
    Bensink M.E.
    Burke L.B.
    Belozeroff V.
    Gwaltney C.
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2 (1)
  • [8] A new symptom-specific patient-reported outcome measure for patients with soft tissue sarcoma
    Rentz, Anne
    Skalicky, Anne
    Ghate, Sameer
    Chawla, Sant P.
    Conley, Anthony P.
    Villalobos, Victor M.
    Perez, Jose Ricardo
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 : 123 - 123
  • [9] Patient-reported outcomes: Instrument development and selection issues
    Turner, Ralph R.
    Quittner, Alexandra L.
    Parasuraman, Bhash M.
    Kallich, Joel D.
    Cleeland, Charles S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 : S86 - S93
  • [10] Visual outcomes, spectacle independence and patient-reported satisfaction of the Vivity extended range of vision intraocular lens
    Kerr, Nathan
    Moshegov, Sophia
    Lim, Samantha
    Simos, Maria
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 51 (09): : 957 - 957