Alimentary allergy to pork.: Crossreactivity among pork kidney and pork and lamb gut

被引:0
|
作者
Llátser, R
Polo, F
De la Hoz, F
Guillaumet, B
机构
[1] Hosp Sant Pau & Santa Tecla, Dept Internal Med, Allergy Unit, E-43003 Tarragona, Spain
[2] ALK, ABELLO, Dept Invest, Madrid, Spain
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY | 1998年 / 28卷 / 08期
关键词
food allergy; pork; anaphylaxis; meat; pork kidney; pork gut; lamb;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background A patient suffered from anaphylaxis after the ingestion of pork gut and kidney, but she tolerated pork meat. Clinical symptoms were also triggered upon intake of lamb gut. Objective To demonstrate an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity and identify the pork proteins involved. And also, to study the possible cross-allergenicity among proteins from lamb gut and pork. Methods and results The patient had strong positive skin-prick test responses to pork kidney, gut and liver, and lamb gut and kidney. RAST technique showed specific IgE to pork kidney, gut and meat. Immunoblotting after SDS-PAGE disclosed the presence of four prominent IgE-binding polypeptides in pork kidney (200, 90, 57, and 47 kDa), two in gut (57 and 27 kDa), and three in meat (51, 40, and 28-30 kDa), apart from other weaker radiostained bands in each extract. The binding of IgE to 200 and 90 kDa allergens from pork kidney was inhibited by gut from pork and lamb in immunoblotting inhibition assays. No inhibition was produced by pork meal. Conclusions A mechanism of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity has been demonstrated in this case of anaphylaxis provoked by pork products. Four main allergens were detected in pork kidney, two of which (200 and 90 kDa) share allergenic epitopes with proteins from pork and lamb gut. On the other hand, pork meat does not seem to have allergenic epitopes in common with pork kidney.
引用
收藏
页码:1021 / 1025
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] New Cuts from the Pork. Passion Meat
    Andel, Birga
    [J]. FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 2020, 100 (12):
  • [3] Classification of pork loin based on intramuscular lipid content to predict sensory and texture of fresh pork.
    Lonergan, S.
    Stalder, K.
    Huff-Lonergan, E.
    Knight, T.
    Goodwin, R.
    Prusa, K.
    Beitz, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 84 : 58 - 59
  • [4] Proteins and waterholding capacity; The case of RSE pork.
    van Laack, RLJM
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1998, 215 : U18 - U18
  • [5] Vitamin A in beef, pork, and lamb
    Hoagland, R
    Snider, GG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1925, 31 : 0201 - 0221
  • [6] Selective Allergy to Raw Pork
    Dominguez-Ortega, J.
    Rodriguez-Jimenez, B.
    Ledesma, A.
    Kindelan, C.
    Gonzalez, J. M.
    Jimenez, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) : 244 - 245
  • [7] Food allergy to pork meat
    Atanaskovic-Markovic, M
    Gavrovic-Jankulovic, M
    Jankov, RM
    Vuèkovic, O
    Nesterovic, B
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2002, 57 (10) : 960 - 961
  • [8] Research on the role of the liver as an erythropoietic organ in the embryos of pork.
    Michalowski, R
    [J]. COMPTES RENDUS DES SEANCES DE LA SOCIETE DE BIOLOGIE ET DE SES FILIALES, 1936, 123 : 34 - 37
  • [9] Zinc content of selected retail cuts of beef and pork.
    Kennedy, WR
    Czajka-Narins, DM
    Imrhan, V
    Radcliffe, JD
    [J]. FASEB JOURNAL, 1999, 13 (05): : A887 - A887
  • [10] AMONG PORK AND BEANS
    AMBERG, JW
    [J]. ENGLISH JOURNAL, 1977, 66 (09): : 37 - 40