Estimating CO2 Emissions from Large Scale Coal-Fired Power Plants Using OCO-2 Observations and Emission Inventories

被引:21
|
作者
Hu, Yaqin [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Yusheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 101408, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
carbon dioxide; Gaussian model; point source; Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2; ANTHROPOGENIC CO2; CITIES; CHINA; ENHANCEMENTS; PERFORMANCE; SPACE;
D O I
10.3390/atmos12070811
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) has increased rapidly worldwide, aggravating the global greenhouse effect, and coal-fired power plants are one of the biggest contributors of greenhouse gas emissions in China. However, efficient methods that can quantify CO2 emissions from individual coal-fired power plants with high accuracy are needed. In this study, we estimated the CO2 emissions of large-scale coal-fired power plants using Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite data based on remote sensing inversions and bottom-up methods. First, we mapped the distribution of coal-fired power plants, displaying the total installed capacity, and identified two appropriate targets, the Waigaoqiao and Qinbei power plants in Shanghai and Henan, respectively. Then, an improved Gaussian plume model method was applied for CO2 emission estimations, with input parameters including the geographic coordinates of point sources, wind vectors from the atmospheric reanalysis of the global climate, and OCO-2 observations. The application of the Gaussian model was improved by using wind data with higher temporal and spatial resolutions, employing the physically based unit conversion method, and interpolating OCO-2 observations into different resolutions. Consequently, CO2 emissions were estimated to be 23.06 +/- 2.82 (95% CI) Mt/yr using the Gaussian model and 16.28 Mt/yr using the bottom-up method for the Waigaoqiao Power Plant, and 14.58 +/- 3.37 (95% CI) and 14.08 Mt/yr for the Qinbei Power Plant, respectively. These estimates were compared with three standard databases for validation: the Carbon Monitoring for Action database, the China coal-fired Power Plant Emissions Database, and the Carbon Brief database. The comparison found that previous emission inventories spanning different time frames might have overestimated the CO2 emissions of one of two Chinese power plants on the two days that the measurements were made. Our study contributes to quantifying CO2 emissions from point sources and helps in advancing satellite-based monitoring techniques of emission sources in the future; this helps in reducing errors due to human intervention in bottom-up statistical methods.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CO2 emissions retrieval from coal-fired power plants based on OCO-2/3 satellite observations and a Gaussian plume model
    Guo, Wenyue
    Shi, Yusheng
    Liu, Yang
    Su, Mengqian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 397
  • [2] Retrieval anthropogenic CO2 emissions from OCO-2 and comparison with gridded emission inventories
    Jin, Chunlin
    Xue, Yong
    Yuan, Tao
    Zhao, Liang
    Jiang, Xingxing
    Sun, Yuxin
    Wu, Shuhui
    Wang, Xiangkai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 448
  • [3] Evaluating Anthropogenic CO2 Bottom-Up Emission Inventories Using Satellite Observations from GOSAT and OCO-2
    Zhang, Shaoqing
    Lei, Liping
    Sheng, Mengya
    Song, Hao
    Li, Luman
    Guo, Kaiyuan
    Ma, Caihong
    Liu, Liangyun
    Zeng, Zhaocheng
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [4] How To Address Data Gaps in Life Cycle Inventories: A Case Study on Estimating CO2 Emissions from Coal-Fired Electricity Plants on a Global Scale
    Steinmann, Zoran J. N.
    Venkatesh, Aranya
    Hauck, Mara
    Schipper, Aafke M.
    Karuppiah, Ramkumar
    Laurenzi, Ian J.
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (09) : 5282 - 5289
  • [5] Advances in quantifying power plant CO2 emissions with OCO-2
    Nassar, Ray
    Mastrogiacomo, Jon-Paul
    Bateman-Hemphill, William
    McCracken, Callum
    MacDonald, Cameron G.
    Hill, Tim
    O'Dell, Christopher W.
    Kiel, Matthaus
    Crisp, David
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 264
  • [6] Estimation of CO2 Emissions from Wildfires Using OCO-2 Data
    Guo, Meng
    Li, Jing
    Wen, Lixiang
    Huang, Shubo
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (10)
  • [7] Comparative Analysis of CO2 Emission Accounting Methods for Coal-fired Power Plants
    Liu, Hongwen
    Ban, Mingfei
    Sun, Yaofei
    Liu, Yiqi
    Chen, Qichao
    Song, Wenlong
    [J]. 2023 2ND ASIAN CONFERENCE ON FRONTIERS OF POWER AND ENERGY, ACFPE, 2023, : 309 - 314
  • [8] COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL SOLVENTS FOR MITIGATING CO2 EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED POWER-PLANTS
    CHAKMA, A
    MEHROTRA, AK
    NIELSEN, B
    [J]. HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEMS & CHP, 1995, 15 (02): : 231 - 240
  • [9] CO2 amine absorption as an opportunity to reduce emissions from domestic coal-fired power plants
    Krotki, Aleksander
    Tatarczuk, Adam
    Wieclaw-Solny, Lucyna
    Stec, Macin
    Sobolewski, Aleksander
    Tokarski, Stanislaw
    [J]. PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2014, 93 (12): : 2241 - 2245
  • [10] Future CO2 emissions and electricity generation from proposed coal-fired power plants in India
    Shearer, Christine
    Fofrich, Robert
    Davis, Steven J.
    [J]. EARTHS FUTURE, 2017, 5 (04) : 408 - 416