Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE)

被引:39
|
作者
Afshar, Kambiz [1 ]
Feichtner, Angelika [2 ]
Boyd, Kirsty [3 ]
Murray, Scott [3 ]
Juenger, Saskia [1 ,4 ]
Wiese, Birgitt [1 ]
Schneider, Nils [1 ]
Mueller-Mundt, Gabriele [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Inst Gen Practice, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Paracelsus Med Univ Salzburg, Strubergasse 21, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Old Med Sch, Usher Inst Populat Hlth Sci & Informat, Teviot Pl, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Cologne, Cologne Ctr Eth Rights Econ & Social Sci Hlth, Albertus Magnus Pl, D-50923 Cologne, Germany
来源
BMC PALLIATIVE CARE | 2018年 / 17卷
关键词
Palliative care; General practice; Primary care; Identification tool; SPICT; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12904-018-0283-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators tool (SPICT) supports the identification of patients with potential palliative care (PC) needs. An Austrian-German expert group translated SPICT into German (SPICT-DE) in 2014. The aim of this study was the systematic development, refinement, and testing of SPICT-DE for its application in primary care (general practice). Methods: SPICT-DE was developed by a multiprofessional research team according to the TRAPD model: translation, review, adjudication, pretesting and documentation. In a pretest, five general practitioners (GPs) rated four case vignettes of patients with different PC needs. GPs were asked to assess whether each patient might benefit from PC or not (I) based on their subjective appraisal ("usual practice") and (II) by using SPICT-DE. After further refinement, two focus groups with 28 GPs (68% with a further qualification in PC) were conducted to test SPICT-DE. Again, participants rated two selected case vignettes (I) based on their subjective appraisal and (II) by using SPICT-DE. Afterwards, participants reflected the suitability of SPICT-DE for use in their daily practice routine within the German primary care system. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests for small samples. Qualitative data were analysed by conventional content analysis. Focus group discussion was analysed combining formal and conventional content analysis. Results: Compared to the spontaneous rating of the case vignettes based on subjective appraisal, participants in both the pretest and the focus groups considered PC more often as being beneficial for the patients described in the case vignettes when using SPICT-DE. Participants in the focus groups agreed that SPICT-DE includes all relevant indicators necessary for an adequate clinical identification of patients who might benefit from PC. Conclusions: SPICT-DE supports the identification of patients who might benefit from PC and seems suitable for routine application in general practice in Germany. The systematic development, refinement, and testing of SPICT-DE in this study was successfully completed by using a multiprofessional and participatory approach.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE)
    Kambiz Afshar
    Angelika Feichtner
    Kirsty Boyd
    Scott Murray
    Saskia Jünger
    Birgitt Wiese
    Nils Schneider
    Gabriele Müller-Mundt
    BMC Palliative Care, 17
  • [2] Palliative Care in the Community: The Greek Version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™)
    Bouri, Maria
    Sakellari, Evanthia
    Krentiris, Dimitrios
    Lagiou, Areti
    JOURNAL OF PRIMARY CARE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2024, 15
  • [3] Implementation and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™) in acute care
    Paulik, Olivia
    Whitaker, Robyn
    Mesuria, Monita
    Wong, Debbie
    Swanson, Katie
    Green, Heidi
    Sikhosana, Nqobile
    Fernandez, Ritin
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2024, 43 (03) : 591 - 599
  • [4] Systematic adaptation of the Thai version of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool for low-income setting (SPICT-LIS)
    Supakorn Sripaew
    Orapan Fumaneeshoat
    Thammasin Ingviya
    BMC Palliative Care, 20
  • [5] Systematic adaptation of the Thai version of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool for low-income setting (SPICT-LIS)
    Sripaew, Supakorn
    Fumaneeshoat, Orapan
    Ingviya, Thammasin
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2021, 20 (01)
  • [6] Development and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT): a mixed-methods study
    Highet, Gill
    Crawford, Debbie
    Murray, Scott A.
    Boyd, Kirsty
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2014, 4 (03) : 285 - 290
  • [7] Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™): content validity, feasibility and pre-test of the Italian version
    Casale, Giuseppe
    Magnani, Caterina
    Fanelli, Renato
    Surdo, Laura
    Goletti, Mauro
    Boyd, Kirsty
    D'Angelo, Daniela
    Mastroianni, Chiara
    Cancian, Maurizio
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [8] Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™): content validity, feasibility and pre-test of the Italian version
    Giuseppe Casale
    Caterina Magnani
    Renato Fanelli
    Laura Surdo
    Mauro Goletti
    Kirsty Boyd
    Daniela D’Angelo
    Chiara Mastroianni
    BMC Palliative Care, 19
  • [9] Spanish adaptation and validation of the supportive & palliative care indicators tool - SPICT-ES™
    Alonso Fachado, Alfonso
    Sanso Martinez, Noemi
    Martin Rosello, Marisa
    Ventosa Rial, Jose Javier
    Benito Oliver, Enric
    Gomez Garcia, Rafael
    Fernandez Garcia, Jose Manuel
    REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2018, 52
  • [10] Adaptation and Validation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT): A Quantitative Methodological Study
    Huang, Yufei
    Deng, Cunqing
    Lin, Haiyang
    Peng, Meifang
    Hao, Yanping
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2025,