A multi-criteria model for evaluating design for manufacturability

被引:15
|
作者
Das, Sanchoy [1 ]
Kanchanapiboon, Atipol [1 ]
机构
[1] New Jersey Inst Technol, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
关键词
design for manufacture; design for assembly; cost estimating; PRODUCT; METHODOLOGY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1080/00207540903505267
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The design for manufacturability (DFM) method is most effective when integrated with the new product development (NPD) process. Due to the focused nature of the associated product and process knowledge and the extensive effort required, there are many NPD situations where classical DFM techniques cannot be readily applied. In this paper, Pro-DFM a multi-criteria model for manufacturability analysis that identifies product realisation opportunities (PRO) for cost reduction is presented. The key assumption in Pro-DFM is that the NPD team has a baseline estimate of production costs, and the evaluation question is how DFM issues will affect the expected unit production cost. The Pro-DFM model analyses a new design in three different factors: part procurement and handling, product assembly fabrication processes, and inventory costs. Each of these is independently analysed using a hierarchy of multiple criteria and sub-criteria. This approach is found to be amenable to most NPD processes, and conducive to easy integration. Each evaluation sub-criterion is presented in the form of a simple query, which is associated with a set of responses that is flexibly anchored to a uni-dimensional scale. A case study example is used to demonstrate the DFM evaluation process and the derivation of the cost penalties.
引用
收藏
页码:1197 / 1217
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria multi-model design optimization
    Bestle, D
    Eberhard, P
    [J]. IUTAM SYMPOSIUM ON OPTIMIZATION OF MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, 1996, 43 : 33 - 40
  • [2] A multi-criteria model for warehouse layout design
    Bazargan-Lari, M
    [J]. MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM, 2001, 507 : 327 - 337
  • [3] Evaluating IT/IS investments: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model approach
    Chou, Tzy-Yuan
    Chou, Seng-cho T.
    Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 173 (03) : 1026 - 1046
  • [4] A multi-criteria decision support model for evaluating the performance of partnerships
    Piltan, Mehdi
    Sowlati, Taraneh
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2016, 45 : 373 - 384
  • [5] Fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for evaluating reconfigurable machines
    Abdi, M. R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2009, 117 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [6] A multi-criteria lifecycle assessment framework for evaluating building systems design
    BuHamdan, Samer
    Alwisy, Aladdin
    Barkokebas, Beda
    Bouferguene, Ahmed
    Al-Hussein, Mohamed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2019, 23 : 388 - 402
  • [7] A Multi-Criteria Model for Evaluating Sustainable Transportation System in West Sumatra
    Amrina, Elita
    Berti, Lavita
    [J]. RECENT PROGRESS ON: MECHANICAL, INFRASTRUCTURE AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 2227
  • [8] A multi-criteria model for the optimal design of distributed energy systems
    Zhou, Zhe
    Liu, Pei
    Li, Zheng
    Ni, Weidou
    [J]. 2012 ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2012,
  • [9] AN INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR EVALUATING PERFORMANCE BY MULTI-CRITERIA
    Yuksel, Mehmet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2015, 30 (03): : 429 - 441
  • [10] A multi-criteria penalty function approach for evaluating a priori model parameter estimates
    Yilmaz, Koray K.
    Gupta, Hoshin V.
    Wagener, Thorsten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 525 : 165 - 177