Do environmental regulations affect FDI decisions? The pollution haven hypothesis revisited

被引:24
|
作者
Yoon, Haeyeon [1 ]
Heshmati, Almas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Econ, 12A Priory Rd, Bristol BS8 1TU, Avon, England
[2] Jonkoping Univ, Jonkoping Int Business Sch JIBS, SE-55111 Jonkoping, Sweden
关键词
pollution haven hypothesis; environmental regulations; foreign direct investment; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; DETERMINANTS; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scaa060
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study attempts to verify the pollution haven hypothesis by investigating the impact of environmental regulations on foreign direct investment (FDI). It uses Korean outward FDI data covering the manufacturing sector for the period 2009-15. This study not only considers the stringency when measuring the degree of the host country's environmental regulations but also the enforcement of these environmental regulations. Since the pollution haven's effects indicate moving the polluting production stages from the home country to other (host) countries, we differentiate between investments in the 'production' part from those in the non-production part using location information about the host country. The main results of a FDI's model estimation show that the stricter the regulations in host countries in Asia, the lower the FDI both intensively and extensively in these countries. This supports the prevalence of the effects of a pollution haven. However, before we separate FDI into the production and non-production parts, the effects of environmental regulations on FDI are hindered by FDI in the non-production part. The results indicate that while environmental regulations are determinants of FDI in the production part, they do not have a significant effect on FDI decisions when the entire FDI is considered.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 131
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effects of FDI and government expenditures on environmental pollution in Korea: the pollution haven hypothesis revisited
    Gokay Canberk Bulus
    Suleyman Koc
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 38238 - 38253
  • [2] The effects of FDI and government expenditures on environmental pollution in Korea: the pollution haven hypothesis revisited
    Bulus, Gokay Canberk
    Koc, Suleyman
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (28) : 38238 - 38253
  • [3] The Effect of FDI on Environmental Degradation in Romania: Testing the Pollution Haven Hypothesis
    Chirilus, Alexandru
    Costea, Adrian
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [4] Demystifying pollution haven hypothesis: Role of FDI
    Singhania, Monica
    Saini, Neha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 123 : 516 - 528
  • [5] Environmental regulation and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis: Do environmental regulation measures matter?
    Yang, Jing
    Guo, Huanxiu
    Liu, Beibei
    Shi, Rui
    Zhang, Bing
    Ye, Weili
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 202 : 993 - 1000
  • [6] FDI and environmental regulation: pollution haven or a race to the top?
    Dong, Baomin
    Gong, Jiong
    Zhao, Xin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2012, 41 (02) : 216 - 237
  • [7] FDI and environmental regulation: pollution haven or a race to the top?
    Baomin Dong
    Jiong Gong
    Xin Zhao
    [J]. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2012, 41 : 216 - 237
  • [8] Does FDI affect environmental degradation? Examining pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses using ARDL modelling
    Kisswani, Khalid M.
    Zaitouni, Michel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMY, 2023, 28 (04) : 1406 - 1432
  • [9] Do environmental regulations affect the location decisions of multinational gold mining firms?
    Tole, Lise
    Koop, Gary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 11 (01) : 151 - 177
  • [10] Relationship between inward FDI and environmental degradation for Pakistan: an exploration of pollution haven hypothesis through ARDL approach
    Nadeem, Abdul M.
    Ali, Tariq
    Khan, Muhammad T. L.
    Guo, Zhengquan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (13) : 15407 - 15425