Outcome of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy with Nasal and Lacrimal Sac Mucosal Flaps

被引:1
|
作者
Jeong, Ilwon [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Sangduck [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wonkwang Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Coll Med, Iksan, South Korea
[2] Inst Wonkwang Med Sci, Iksan, South Korea
来源
关键词
Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy; Nasal mucosa flap; Nasolacrimal sac mucosal flap; ENDOSCOPIC DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY;
D O I
10.3341/jkos.2021.62.7.881
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: In patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction, the outcomes of surgery were evaluated according to the type or presence of flaps. Methods: In total, 509 eyes were compared retrospectively: 178 eyes in patients treated without flaps, 126 eyes in patients treated using nasal mucosa flaps, and 205 eyes in the patient group using nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flap were compared retrospectively. We analyzed the factors of success according to the surgical method by comparing granulation and bony ostium obstruction at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery in each group. Results: At 6 months after surgery, granulation was found in 6 eyes (2.93%) in the nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flap group, 5 eyes (3.96%) in the nasal mucosal flap group, and 15 eyes (8.42%) in the group treated without flaps. Bony ostium obstruction was found in 3 eyes (1.46%) in the nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flap group, 4 eyes (2.38%) in the nasal mucosal flap group, and 6 eyes (2.81%) in the group treated without flaps. The anatomical surgical success rate of patients treated with nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flaps was 95.61%, which was higher than those of patients treated with nasal mucosal flaps (92.86%) and without flaps (88.20%). The functional and anatomical surgical success rate was 94.15% in the group treated with nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flaps, 88.89% in the group treated with nasal mucosal flaps, and 84.83% in the group treated without flaps. Conclusions: Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy using the nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flap is an effective method that minimizes the risk of granulation and bony ostium obstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 887
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Outcomes of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy Using Fibrin Glue for Lacrimal Sac and Nasal Mucosal Flaps
    Lee, Chae Yoon
    Kim, Sang Soo
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 65 (09): : 573 - 580
  • [2] Anastomosis of nasal mucosal and lacrimal sac flaps in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy
    Matteo Trimarchi
    A. Giordano Resti
    C. Bellini
    M. Forti
    M. Bussi
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2009, 266 : 1747 - 1752
  • [3] Anastomosis of nasal mucosal and lacrimal sac flaps in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy
    Trimarchi, Matteo
    Resti, A. Giordano
    Bellini, C.
    Forti, M.
    Bussi, M.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2009, 266 (11) : 1747 - 1752
  • [4] Mucosal and lacrimal flaps for endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a systematic review
    Green, R.
    Gohil, R.
    Ross, P.
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 42 (03) : 514 - 520
  • [5] Comment on: Mucosal and lacrimal flaps for endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: A systematic review
    Lenzi, R.
    Muscatello, L.
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 43 (01) : 393 - 394
  • [6] Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps
    Tsirbas, A
    Wormald, PJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 135 (01) : 76 - 83
  • [7] Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps
    Tsirbas, A
    Wormald, PJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 87 (01) : 43 - 47
  • [8] Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy:: Location of lacrimal sac with forceps
    Komínek, P
    Cervenka, S
    Matousek, P
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2004, 114 (09): : 1674 - 1676
  • [9] Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps
    Tsirbas, Angelo
    Wormald, Peter John
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 39 (05) : 1019 - +
  • [10] Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy with nasal mucosal and posterior lacrimal sac flap
    Sonkhya, N.
    Mishra, P.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2009, 123 (03): : 320 - 326