Comparative bioavailability of two oral formulations of mycophenolate mofetil in healthy adult Uruguayan subjects: a case of highly variable rate of drug absorption

被引:0
|
作者
Estevez-Carrizo, F. E. [1 ]
Parrillo, S. [1 ]
Cedres, M. [2 ]
Estevez-Parrillo, F. T. [2 ]
Rodriguez, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montevideo, Ctr Biomed Sci, Montevideo, Uruguay
[2] Hosp ltaliano, Ctr Clin Pharmacol Res, Montevideo, Uruguay
关键词
mycophenolate mofetil; immunosuppressant; absorption rate; bioequivalence; BIOEQUIVALENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the bioequivalence and safety of a new formulation of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 500 mg (Suprimun (R), Clausen, Montevideo, Uruguay) marketed in Uruguay and other South American countries, and to test C-max/AUC as a characteristic of its absorption rate. Material and methods: A randomized, open-label, two-way, two-treatment, two-period crossover study in 24 healthy male volunteers was carried out. One tablet (500 mg) of each formulation was administered after an overnight fast. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 36 hours. Plasma concentrations of MPA were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Analysis of variance was carried out using log-transformed AUC(0-36), C-max, and C-max/AUC(0-36). 90% confidence intervals and within-subject between-subject variance were calculated. The bioequivalence of the two formulations was established at the 80% - 125% acceptance limits and untransformed t(max) medians were compared using Wilcoxon test. Subjects were monitored for adverse events throughout the study. Results: The means (test and reference) were 21.14 and 20.86 mu g x h x ml(-1) for AUC(0-36), 24.92 and 24.18 mu g x h x ml(-1) for AUC(0-infinity), 11.86 and 10.76 mu g x ml(-1) for C-max and 0.51 and 0.54 h(-1) for C-max/AUC(0-36). The geometric mean ratios (confidence interval 90%) of Test/Reference were 1.00 (0.95 - 1.06) for AUC(0-36), 1.09 (0.96 - 1.24) for C-max and 1.04 (0.99 - 1.09) for C-max/AUC(0-36). The extra peaks observed are due to enterohepatic recycling of MPA. No serious or unexpected adverse events were observed during the study. Conclusions: The test formulation containing mycophenolate mofetil 500 mg met regulatory requirements for bioequivalence. Moreover, C-max/AUC shows interesting features as a putative metric to evaluate the absorption rate of highly variable drugs like
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 627
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Relative bioavailability study of two oral formulations of mycophenolate mofetil in healthy volunteers
    Saavedra S, Ivan
    Sasso A, Jaime
    Quinones S, Luis
    Saavedra B, Monica
    Gaete G, Leonardo
    Boza T, Ignacio
    Carvajal H, Cristobal
    Soto L, Jorge
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2011, 139 (07) : 902 - 908
  • [2] COMPARATIVE BIOAVAILABILITY STUDY OF TWO MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL FORMULATIONS IN STABLE KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    Sunder-Plassmann, Gere
    Reinke, Petra
    Rath, Thomas
    Wiecek, Andrzej
    Nowicki, Michal
    Moore, Richard
    Lutz, Jens
    Gaggl, Martina
    Ferkl, Marek
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 24 : 81 - 81
  • [3] Bioavailability of two different oral formulations of amoxicillin in healthy subjects
    Molinaro, M
    Corona, G
    Fiorito, V
    Spreafico, S
    Bartoli, AN
    Zoia, C
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 1997, 47 (12): : 1406 - 1410
  • [4] Bioavailability of two oral suspension and two oral tablet formulations of nimesulide 100 mg in healthy Brazilian adult subjects
    Rigato, H. M.
    Borges, B. C.
    Sverdloff, C. E.
    Moreno, R. A.
    Orpineli, E.
    Borges, N. Carter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 48 (03) : 233 - 242
  • [5] Comparative bioavailability study of zidovudine administered as two different tablet formulations in healthy adult subjects
    Marier, J. F.
    Manthos, H.
    Kebir, S.
    Ferron, S.
    DiMarco, M.
    Morelli, G.
    Tippabhotla, S. K.
    Vijan, T.
    Singla, A. K.
    Garg, M.
    Monif, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 44 (05) : 240 - 246
  • [6] Comparative bioavailability of two oral formulations of bromazepam in healthy volunteers
    Lerner, FE
    Schere, D
    Batafarano, N
    Casas, F
    Glancszpigel, R
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2001, 51 (12): : 955 - 958
  • [7] Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of mycophenolate mofetil in healthy subjects after single-dose oral and intravenous administration
    Bullingham, R
    Monroe, S
    Nicholls, A
    Hale, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 36 (04): : 315 - 324
  • [8] Comparative bioavailability of two oral formulations of piroxicam in Mexican subjects.
    Carrasco-Portugal, MC
    Acedo, R
    Aguilar-Carrasco, JC
    Herrera, JE
    Flores-Murrieta, FJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 43 (09): : 1037 - 1037
  • [9] Comparative bioavailability of two oral formulations of carbamazepine in Mexican subjects.
    Carrasco-Portugal, MC
    Aguilar-Carrasco, JC
    Aguilar-Cota, ME
    Reyes-Garcia, G
    Medina-Santillán, R
    Flores-Murrieta, FJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 45 (09): : 1079 - 1079
  • [10] Pharmacokinetics and Comparative Bioavailability of Domperidone Suspension and Tablet Formulations in Healthy Adult Subjects
    Helmy, Sally A.
    El Bedaiwy, Heba M.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 3 (02): : 126 - 131