The use of different happiness rating scales: Bias and comparison problem?

被引:21
|
作者
Lim, Hock-Eam [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utara Malaysia, Fac Econ, Sintok 06010, Kedah, Malaysia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Econ, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
关键词
happiness; comparison of mean happiness; rescaling; transition probability;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-007-9171-x
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This paper uses data of reported happiness which is measured at 4, 5, 7 and 11 likert-scale points. A group of 137 respondents was selected to study the comparison problem on the estimated mean happiness using direct rescaling. It is found that the 11-point scale's estimated mean happiness is significantly higher than the 4 and 7-point scale. This paper also proposes an alternate method of rescaling using transition probabilities as weights. This adjusted rescaling resembles the calculation of expected value and provides better mean comparison.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:259 / 267
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Use of Different Happiness Rating Scales: Bias and Comparison Problem?
    Hock-Eam Lim
    Social Indicators Research, 2008, 87 : 259 - 267
  • [2] Comparison of three different types of rating scales
    Dutoit, Renee
    Pritchard, Nicola
    Simpson, Trefford
    Heffernan, Sonia
    Optometry and Vision Science, 2000, 77 (12 SUPPL.)
  • [3] Comparison of different rating scales for the use in Delphi studies: different scales lead to different consensus and show different test-retest reliability
    Lange, Toni
    Kopkow, Christian
    Luetzner, Joerg
    Guenther, Klaus-Peter
    Gravius, Sascha
    Scharf, Hanns-Peter
    Stoeve, Johannes
    Wagner, Richard
    Schmitt, Jochen
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [4] Comparison of different rating scales for the use in Delphi studies: different scales lead to different consensus and show different test-retest reliability
    Toni Lange
    Christian Kopkow
    Jörg Lützner
    Klaus-Peter Günther
    Sascha Gravius
    Hanns-Peter Scharf
    Johannes Stöve
    Richard Wagner
    Jochen Schmitt
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20
  • [5] A comparison of three different scales for rating contact lens handling
    Du Toit, R
    Pritchard, N
    Heffernan, S
    Simpson, T
    Fonn, D
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2002, 79 (05) : 313 - 320
  • [6] Comparison of Dyskinesia Rating Scales: Use in the IV Levodopa Paradigm
    Mestre, T.
    Huot, P.
    Walsh, R.
    So, J.
    Wielgosz, J.
    Yip, P.
    Fox, S. H.
    Miyasaki, J. M.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2011, 26 (05) : VIII - VIII
  • [7] HANDEDNESS BIAS IN PREFERENCE RATING-SCALES
    KIRKSMITH, M
    JOURNAL OF THE MARKET RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1995, 37 (02): : 195 - 202
  • [8] NEUTRALIZATION OF STIMULUS BIAS IN AUDITORY RATING SCALES
    POLLACK, I
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1964, 36 (07): : 1272 - &
  • [9] Comparison between different rating scales for 3D TV
    Brunnström, Kjell
    Ananth, Indirajith Vijai
    Hedberg, Christer
    Wang, Kun
    Andrén, Börje
    Barkowsky, Marcus
    Digest of Technical Papers - SID International Symposium, 2013, 44 (01): : 509 - 512
  • [10] BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING-SCALES VS SUMMATED RATING-SCALES - PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TO RATING BIAS
    KINICKI, AJ
    BANNISTER, BD
    HOM, PW
    DENISI, AS
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1985, 45 (03) : 535 - 549