共 50 条
Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer
被引:8
|作者:
Su, Po-Hsu
[1
]
Hsueh, Shun-Wen
[1
]
Tseng, Chen-Kan
[2
,3
]
Ho, Ming-Mo
[3
,4
]
Su, Po-Jung
[3
,4
]
Hung, Chia-Yen
[3
,4
]
Yeh, Kun-Yun
[1
]
Chang, Pei-Hung
[1
]
Hung, Yu-Shin
[3
,4
]
Ho, Ya -Wen
[3
,4
]
Lin, Yu-Ching
[5
]
Chou, Wen-Chi
[3
,4
]
机构:
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Keelung, Dept Oncol, Keelung, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkou, Dept Div Radiat Oncol, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkou, Div Hematol & Oncol, Dept Internal Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Keelung, Dept Med Imaging & Intervent, Keelung, Taiwan
来源:
关键词:
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy;
carboplatin;
cisplatin;
esophageal cancer;
outcome;
LOCALLY ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL;
PHASE-III TRIAL;
PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY;
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL;
CHEMORADIATION;
THERAPY;
SURGERY;
D O I:
10.21873/invivo.12638
中图分类号:
R-3 [医学研究方法];
R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号:
1001 ;
摘要:
Background/Aim: Cisplatin with 5-fluouracil (Cis/5Fu) and paclitaxel with carboplatin (Pac/Car) are common regimens used in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC). Here, we aimed to compare the survival outcomes and treatment-related toxicities between these regimens in neoadjuvant CCRT in patients with locally advanced EC. Patients and Methods: One hundred and thirty-six patients with locally advanced EC (98% squamous cell carcinoma) were prospectively recruited between 2016 and 2017 in a non-randomized manner. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the chemotherapeutic agents administered (Pac/Car group, n=87; Cis/5Fu group, n=47) in CCRT to compare the survival outcome and severe adverse event (sAE) incidence. Results: Forty-two patients (85.7%) and 80 patients (91.4%) in the Cis/5Fu and Pac/Car groups completed pre - planned CCRT (p=0.26), respectively. The Cis/5Fu group presented a higher incidence of non-hematological sAE than the Pac/Car group (69.45% vs. 51.7%, p=0.049). Patients in the Pac/Car group showed a higher rate of surgical resection than those in the Cis/5Fu group (49.4% vs. 22.4%, p<0.001). After a median follow-up duration of 22.0 months (range=1.9-31.8), the 2-year survival rate was 56.9% for patients in the Pac/Car group and 28.7% for the Cis/5Fu group. The hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival was 0.45 (95%CI=0.28-0.72, p=0.001) in the comparison between the groups. Conclusion: Overall, neoadjuvant CCRT with Pac/Car is associated with a better survival outcome, higher surgical resection rate, and better safety profiles than Cis/5Fu in patients with locally advanced EC.
引用
收藏
页码:3391 / 3399
页数:9
相关论文