Intralesional corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciopathy

被引:74
|
作者
Porter, MD [1 ]
Shadbolt, B
机构
[1] Ipswich Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Ipswich, Qld 4305, Australia
[2] Canberra Hosp, Dept Epidemiol, Garran, Australia
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE | 2005年 / 15卷 / 03期
关键词
prospective; plantar fasciopathy; chronic; corticosteroid injection; ESWT;
D O I
10.1097/01.jsm.0000164039.91787.dc
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy of low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and intralesional corticosteroid injection (CSI) for the treatment of plantar fasciopathy present for at least 6 weeks. Design: A prospective, randomized, controlled, observer-blinded study over a period of 12 months. Setting: Primary care and hospital setting. Patients: A total of 132 patients were enrolled in the study, and 125 completed the study. Nineteen nonrandomized patients acted as a surrogate control group. Interventions: All patients performed a standardized Achilles tendon and plantar fascia stretching program. The patients were randomly allocated to either treatment group A or B. Group A received a single CSI, while group B were referred for a course of low-dose ESWT comprising 3 treatments over a period of 3 weeks. Group C consisted of 19 nonrandomized patients who performed the standardized stretching program only. Main Outcome Measurements: The worst daily pain recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS), and the tenderness at the plantar fascia insertion as determined by an algometer. These measures were recorded immediately prior to the commencement of treatment and 3 months and 12 months posttreatment. Results: With regard to VAS pain scores, values for the CSI (1.48; 0-7) were significantly lower than both ESWT (3.69; 0-8), and controls (3.58; 2-5) at 3 months. At 12 months, VAS scores for CSI (0.84; 0-7) and ESWT (0.84; 0-4) were both significantly lower than controls (2.42; 1-4). The tenderness values at 3 months were significantly higher for CSI (9.42; 7-11) than both ESWT (6.72; 4-11) and controls (7.63; 6-9). P < 0.05 was used throughout. Conclusions: Corticosteroid injection is more efficacious and multiple times more cost-effective than ESWT in the treatment of plantar fasciopathy that has been symptomatic for more than 6 weeks.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 124
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus corticosteroid injection for chronic plantar fasciitis A protocol of randomized controlled trial
    Zhao, Jie
    Luo, Wen Ming
    Li, Tingting
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (19) : E19920
  • [2] Comparison Between Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Local Corticosteroid Injection for Plantar Fasciitis
    Xu, Dingli
    Jiang, Weiyu
    Huang, Dichao
    Hu, Xudong
    Wang, Yang
    Li, Haojie
    Zhou, Shuyi
    Gan, Kaifeng
    Ma, Weihu
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 41 (02) : 200 - 205
  • [3] Shock wave therapy for chronic plantar fasciopathy
    Rompe, Jan D.
    Furia, John
    Weil, Lowell
    Maffulli, Nicola
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 81-82 : 183 - 208
  • [4] Resistant plantar fasciopathy: shock wave versus endoscopic plantar fascial release
    Yasser A. Radwan
    Ali M. Reda Mansour
    Walid S. Badawy
    International Orthopaedics, 2012, 36 : 2147 - 2156
  • [5] Resistant plantar fasciopathy: shock wave versus endoscopic plantar fascial release
    Radwan, Yasser A.
    Mansour, Ali M. Reda
    Badawy, Walid S.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2012, 36 (10) : 2147 - 2156
  • [6] Success and Recurrence Rate after Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Plantar Fasciopathy: A Retrospective Study
    Malliaropoulos, Nikos
    Crate, Georgina
    Meke, Maria
    Korakakis, Vasileios
    Nauck, Tanja
    Lohrer, Heinz
    Padhiar, Nat
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [7] Comparison of High-Dose Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Intralesional Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis
    Yucel, Istemi
    Ozturan, Kutay Engin
    Demiraran, Yavuz
    Degirmenci, Erdem
    Kaynak, Gursel
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 100 (02) : 105 - 110
  • [8] Plantar Fascia-Specific Stretching Versus Radial Shock-Wave Therapy as Initial Treatment of Plantar Fasciopathy
    Rompe, Jan D.
    Cacchio, Angelo
    Weil, Lowell, Jr.
    Furia, John P.
    Haist, Joachim
    Reiners, Volker
    Schmitz, Christoph
    Maffulli, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (15): : 2514 - 2522
  • [9] Extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus corticosteroid injection in the treatment of trigger finger: a randomized controlled study
    Yildirim, P.
    Gultekin, A.
    Yildirim, A.
    Karahan, A. Y.
    Tok, F.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2016, 41 (09) : 977 - 983
  • [10] Endoscopic plantar fasciotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy for treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis
    Othman, Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed
    Ragab, Ehab Mohamed
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2010, 130 (11) : 1343 - 1347