Biomechanical analysis of anterior cervical spine plate fixation systems with unicortical and bicortical screw purchase

被引:9
|
作者
Lehmann, W
Blauth, M
Briem, D
Schmidt, U [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Trauma Surg, D-3000 Hannover, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Sch Med, Dept Trauma Surg, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
cervical spine; anterior plate fixation; biomechanics;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-003-0578-z
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Anterior plate fixation with unicortical screw purchase does not involve the risk of posterior cortex penetration and possible injuries of the spinal cord. However, there are very few biomechanical data about the immediate stability of non-locking plate fixation with unicortical or bicortical screw placement. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the immediate biomechanical properties in terms of flexibility of a non-locking anterior plate system with 4.5-mm screw fixation and unicortical or bicortical screw purchase applied to a single destabilized cervical spine motion segment. Using fresh cadaveric cervical spine specimens C3-C7, multidirectional flexibility was measured at the level C4-C5 before and after destabilization and fixation with an anterior plate with either unicortical or bicortical screw purchase. The results showed that fixed cervical spine segments with anterior plate and bicortical screw purchase were more rigid than intact specimens in all modes of testing. The difference was statistically significant for flexion and extension (P<0.001). Plate fixation with unicortical screw purchase had statistically significant decreased ranges of motion compared to the intact specimen only in extension. Neither unicortical nor bicortical screw purchase decreased the range of motion significantly in axial rotation compared to the intact specimens. This in vitro study documented that neither unicortical nor bicortical screw purchase with non-locking plate fixation can increase stability in all modes of testing, in axial rotation in particular. Direct comparison between the group with uni- and that with bicortical screw fixation did not reveal significant differences, and therefore no advantage was shown for either type of screw fixation. Therefore, we demonstrated that both uni- and bicortical screw purchase with non-locking plate fixation can decrease immediate flexibility of the tested motion segment, with better results for bicortical purchase. No significant differences were found comparing the two groups of screw fixation. These data suggest that unicortical screw fixation can be used for anterior plate fixation with a comparable immediate stability to bicortical screw fixation.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 75
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical analysis of anterior cervical spine plate fixation systems with unicortical and bicortical screw purchase
    Wolfgang Lehmann
    Michael Blauth
    Daniel Briem
    Ulf Schmidt
    European Spine Journal, 2004, 13 : 69 - 75
  • [2] Biomechanical evaluation of subcortical versus bicortical screw purchase in anterior cervical plating
    Chen, IH
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1996, 138 (02) : 167 - 173
  • [3] Anterior fixation of cervical spine: Bicortical screw-plate vs. monocortical self-locking systems
    Ceddia, A
    Carraturo, S
    Guglielmi, G
    Cammisa, M
    DAngelo, V
    11TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 1465 - 1469
  • [4] Cervical stability with lateral mass plating -: Unicortical versus bicortical screw purchase
    Muffoletto, AJ
    Yang, JP
    Vadhva, M
    Hadjipavlou, AG
    SPINE, 2003, 28 (08) : 778 - 781
  • [5] Biomechanical evaluation of locking plate radial shaft fixation: Unicortical locking fixation versus mixed bicortical and unicortical fixation in a sawbone model
    Roberts, Jason W.
    Grindel, Steven I.
    Rebholz, Brandon
    Wang, Mei
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 32A (07): : 971 - 975
  • [6] Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine locked and unlocked plate-fixation systems
    Lehmann, W
    Briem, D
    Blauth, M
    Schmidt, U
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2005, 14 (03) : 243 - 249
  • [7] Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine locked and unlocked plate-fixation systems
    Wolfgang Lehmann
    Daniel Briem
    Michael Blauth
    Ulf Schmidt
    European Spine Journal, 2005, 14 : 243 - 249
  • [8] Biomechanical comparison of unicortical versus bicortical C1 lateral mass screw fixation
    Eck, Jason C.
    Walker, Matt P.
    Currier, Bradord L.
    Chen, Qingshan
    Yaszemski, Michael J.
    An, Kai-Nan
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2007, 20 (07): : 505 - 508
  • [9] BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF CERVICAL STABILIZATION SYSTEMS - AN ASSESSMENT OF TRANSPEDICULAR SCREW FIXATION IN THE CERVICAL-SPINE
    KOTANI, Y
    CUNNINGHAM, BW
    ABUMI, K
    MCAFEE, PC
    SPINE, 1994, 19 (22) : 2529 - 2539
  • [10] A biomechanical comparison of modern anterior and posterior plate fixation of the cervical spine
    Koh, YD
    Lim, TH
    You, JW
    Eck, J
    An, HS
    SPINE, 2001, 26 (01) : 15 - 21