Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy

被引:51
|
作者
Derweesh, IH
Goldfarb, DA
Abreu, SC
Goel, M
Flechner, SM
Modlin, C
Zhou, LM
Streem, SB
Novick, AC
Gill, IS
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Glickman Urol Inst, Sect Renal Transplanatat, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Glickman Urol Inst, Sect Laparoscop & Minimally Invas Surg, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Glickman Urol Inst, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.051
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To assess the patterns of early functional recovery and long-term function in laparoscopic and open procured live donor nephrectomy (LDN) kidneys, highlighting the radionuclide scan as an additional tool for assessment, because of concerns regarding renal functional recovery after laparoscopic LDN. Methods. We reviewed the donor and recipient records of 101 laparoscopic and 35 open LDNs performed between August 1997 and September 2001. Data were collected on demographic, immunologic, and intraoperative variables and ureteral/vascular complications. Delayed renal function recovery in recipients was evaluated by serum creatinine greater than 2.5 mg/dL on postoperative day 5, dialysis in first postoperative week, and two renographic criteria-the time to peak activity and the time to one-half peak activity on postoperative day 5. Long-term outcomes were evaluated by serum creatinine at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and 2 and 3 years, creatinine clearance at 1 year, and patient and allograft survival. Results. Donor and recipient age, sex, body mass index, and number of HLA mismatches did not differ between the two groups. The mean operating room time and blood loss were comparable. No differences were found in the early functional parameters (renography, creatinine at postoperative day 1 and 5, or dialysis in week 1) or long-term outcome (patient and graft survival, creatinine, and rejection at 1 year and patient and graft survival at 1, 2, and 3 years). Conclusions. Early recovery of graft function, longer term renal function, and 3-year patient and allograft survival are similar for live donor kidneys obtained by either a laparoscopic or an open surgical technique. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:862 / 866
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared to open donor nephrectomy
    Derweesh, IH
    Abreu, SC
    Goldfarb, DA
    Gill, IS
    Flechner, S
    Modlin, C
    Goel, M
    Kaouk, J
    Krishnamurthi, V
    Streem, SB
    Novick, AC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04): : 469 - 469
  • [2] Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Outcomes equivalent to open surgery
    Lee, BR
    Chow, GK
    Ratner, LE
    Kavoussi, LR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2000, 14 (10) : 811 - 819
  • [3] Pure laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: Equivalent donor and recipient outcomes as compared with laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy.
    Mahanty, HD
    Carter, JT
    Kang, SM
    Roberts, JP
    Freise, CE
    Posselt, AM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 481 - 481
  • [4] Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Outcomes equivalent to open surgery - Editorial comment
    Jacobs, SC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2000, 14 (10) : 819 - 820
  • [5] A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy
    Nogueira, JM
    Cangro, CB
    Fink, JC
    Schweitzer, E
    Wiland, A
    Klassen, DK
    Gardner, J
    Flowers, J
    Jacobs, S
    Cho, E
    Philosophe, B
    Bartlett, ST
    Weir, MR
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (05) : 722 - 728
  • [6] Early and late recipient graft function and donor outcome after laparoscopic vs open adult live donor nephrectomy for pediatric renal transplantation
    Troppmann, C
    Pierce, JL
    Wiesmann, KM
    Butani, L
    Makker, SP
    McVicar, JP
    Wolfe, BM
    Perez, RV
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2002, 137 (08) : 908 - 915
  • [7] Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
    Flowers, JL
    Jacobs, S
    Cho, E
    Morton, A
    Rosenberger, WF
    Evans, D
    Imbembo, AL
    Bartlett, ST
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 226 (04) : 483 - 489
  • [8] Renal transplantation: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
    Kim, FJ
    Ratner, LE
    Kavoussi, LR
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 27 (04) : 777 - +
  • [9] Comparison of open live donor nephrectomy, laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy, and hand-assisted live donor nephrectomy: A cost-minimization analysis
    Dageforde, Leigh Anne
    Moore, Deonna R.
    Landman, Matthew P.
    Feurer, Irene D.
    Pinson, C. Wright
    Poulose, Benjamin
    Penson, David F.
    Moore, Derek E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 176 (02) : E89 - E94
  • [10] Robot-assisted laparoscopic and open live-donor nephrectomy:: a comparison of donor morbidity and early renal allograft outcomes
    Renoult, E
    Hubert, J
    Ladrière, M
    Billaut, N
    Mourey, E
    Feuillu, B
    Kessler, M
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 21 (02) : 472 - 477