Monopolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Patients With and Without Preoperative Urinary Catheterization: A Prospective Comparative Study

被引:2
|
作者
Adhikari, Baikuntha [1 ]
Shrestha, Anil [1 ]
Basnet, Robin B. [1 ]
Shrestha, Parash M. [1 ]
Gharti, Binod B. [1 ]
Shah, Arvind K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bir Hosp, Natl Acad Med Sci, Urol, Kathmandu, Nepal
关键词
acute urinary retention; benign prostatic hyperplasia; monopolar; transurethral resection of prostate; trial without catheter; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; RETENTION; SYMPTOMS; MEN; MORBIDITY; SECONDARY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.16705
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background A significant proportion of patients undergo surgery for benign proslatic hyperplasia following acute urinary retention. Studies have reported conflicting results of improvement following transurethral surgery in these patients. Objective To compare perioperative complications and postoperative voiding parameters in patients undergoing monopolar transurethral resection of prostate with and without preoperative Foley catheterization. Methods A prospective non-randomized study was conducted in patients undergoing monopolar transurethral resection of prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Patients were divided into those with Foley catheterization preoperatively (n=52), and those without catheters (n=90). Change in hemoglobin level, the resected volume of prostate, complications and the need for postoperative catheterization were compared. Postoperative symptoms score using International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum flow rate and post-void residual volume were assessed at three months follow up. Results The mean operative duration, length of stay and resected volume were higher in those patients with catheters; however, no significant differences were noted for mean hemoglobin level change and need for postoperative recatheterization. Three patients in each group required recatheterization and, all were catheter-free at one week postoperatively. Complications developed in 16.1% (n=23) with most of them being Clavien I. Patients with catheters had a lower postoperative maximum flow rate than those without it (16.90 vs 19.75 mL/sec). Patients with catheters had a significantly better postoperative quality of life and symptom score. Conclusion Monopolar transurethral resection of prostate in patients with preoperative per-urethral Foley catheter for acute urinary retention had similar postoperative voiding parameters with comparable complication rates to those without a catheter.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bipolar or monopolar transurethral resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia?
    Inzunza, Gabriel
    Rada, Gabriel
    Majerson, Alejandro
    MEDWAVE, 2018, 18 (01):
  • [2] Monopolar and bipolar transurethral prostate resection in surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Hasirci, Eray
    Dirim, Ayhan
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2012, 11 (04): : 265 - 269
  • [3] The PROSTATE Nomogram for the Preoperative Prediction of Clinical Efficacy of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients
    Tian, Ye
    Zhang, Heng
    Cao, Ying
    Yang, Lu
    Luo, Guangheng
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2022, 17 : 845 - 855
  • [4] Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate in management of benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Sayed, Salah
    Elshorbagy, Amr
    Mahmoud, Mahmoud A.
    Mostafa, Diaaeldin
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 40 (01): : 121 - 130
  • [5] A shared decision: Bipolar vs. monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Bhojani, Naeem
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    Elterman, Dean
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (12): : 431 - 431
  • [6] Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: safe in patients with high surgical risk
    Yang, Er J.
    Li, Hao
    Sun, Xin B.
    Huang, Li
    Wang, Li
    Gong, Xiao X.
    Yang, Yong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [7] Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: safe in patients with high surgical risk
    Er J. Yang
    Hao Li
    Xin B. Sun
    Li Huang
    Li Wang
    Xiao X. Gong
    Yong Yang
    Scientific Reports, 6
  • [8] A comparative study on transurethral vaporization of the prostate and transurethral resection of prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia - a single centre experience
    Lu, Y.
    Yeow, S.
    Tan, Y. K.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 : 2 - 3
  • [9] A prospective randomized study comparing bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: efficacy, sexual function, Quality of Life, and complications
    Otaola-Arca, Hugo
    Alvarez-Ardura, Manuel
    Molina-Escudero, Roberto
    Fernandez, Mario, I
    Paez-Borda, Alvaro
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2021, 47 (01): : 131 - 144
  • [10] Comparative Evaluation of Uroflowmetric Parameters in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
    Narendra, J. B.
    Sathishkumar, N.
    Ravikumar, G., V
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2019, 13 (12)