Academic-contingent self-worth and the social monitoring system

被引:2
|
作者
vanDellen, Michelle R. [1 ]
Hoy, Melanie B. [2 ]
Fernandez, Katya [3 ]
Hoyle, Rick H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Pembroke, NC 28372 USA
[3] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
Contingencies of self worth; Self esteem; Sociometer model; Social exclusion; BELONG; NEED; PERFORMANCE; PERCEPTION; EXCLUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.022
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous research suggests that individuals closely monitor information about their own social standing particularly when their social value is threatened We posit that information perceived as most relevant to social relationships is particularly monitored when a threat occurs and that the information that is most relevant to social relationships is represented by the areas in which individuals base their self worth One hundred and ten participants were asked to participate in an online discussion with research confederates Participants were randomly assigned to a condition in which they were socially excluded by the other participants or not socially excluded Next they were asked to complete a recall task for diary entries that involved information about different domains of self worth Participants in the social exclusion condition who self-reported that they placed a high value on academics for self-evaluatory pur poses recalled more information relating to the domain of academics after this threat than did those who did not consider academics to be as important to their self worth We discuss these results in terms of both the sociometer and contingency models of self worth and conclude that contingencies of self-worth may develop as markers of information perceived important to social relationships (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 63
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contingent self-worth and Facebook addiction
    Kanat-Maymon, Yaniv
    Almog, Lian
    Cohen, Rinat
    Amichai-Hamburger, Yair
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2018, 88 : 227 - 235
  • [2] Reach for the STARS? The role of academic contingent self-worth in statistics anxiety and learning*
    Fairlamb, Samuel
    Papadopoulou, Helena
    Bourne, Victoria J.
    [J]. LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 2022, 78
  • [3] Development and Validation of the Sexual Contingent Self-Worth Scale
    Glowacka, Maria
    Rosen, Natalie O.
    Vannier, Sarah
    MacLellan, Margaret C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 2017, 54 (01) : 117 - 129
  • [4] Mastery goals and contingent self-worth: A field study
    Niiya, Yu
    Crocker, Jennifer
    [J]. REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PSYCHOLOGIE SOCIALE-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 21 (1-2): : 135 - 154
  • [5] When grades determine self-worth: Consequences of contingent self-worth for male and female engineering and psychology majors
    Crocker, J
    Karpinski, A
    Quinn, DM
    Chase, SK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 85 (03) : 507 - 516
  • [6] Reducing contingent self-worth: A defensive response to self-threats
    Buckingham, Justin T.
    Lam, Tiffany A.
    Andrade, Fernanda C.
    Boring, Brandon L.
    Emery, Danielle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 159 (03): : 284 - 298
  • [7] Contingency of self-worth reduce academic procrastination?
    Kurozumi, Ryo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 58 : 829 - 829
  • [8] CONTINGENT SELF-WORTH AND SOCIAL INFORMATION PROCESSING: COGNITIVE ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN DOMAIN PERFORMANCE AND SOCIAL RELATIONS
    vanDellen, Michelle R.
    Hoy, Melanie B.
    Hoyle, Rick H.
    [J]. SOCIAL COGNITION, 2009, 27 (06) : 847 - 866
  • [9] Contingent Self-worth and Gender Differences in Adolescent Depression: A Commentary
    Burwell, Rebecca A.
    Shirk, Stephen R.
    [J]. SEX ROLES, 2009, 61 (11-12) : 769 - 777
  • [10] Perfectionism and Contingent Self-Worth in Relation to Disordered Eating and Anxiety
    Bardone-Cone, Anna M.
    Lin, Stacy L.
    Butler, Rachel M.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2017, 48 (03) : 380 - 390