Ampicillin-sulbactam and amoxicillin-clavulanate susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli isolates with different β-lactam resistance phenotypes

被引:24
|
作者
Oliver, A [1 ]
Pérez-Vázquez, M [1 ]
Martínez-Ferrer, M [1 ]
Baquero, F [1 ]
De Rafael, L [1 ]
Cantón, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Microbiol Serv, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AAC.43.4.862
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The activities of ampicillin-sulbactam and amoxicillin-clavulanate were studied,vith 100 selected clinical Escherichia coli isolates with different beta-lactam susceptibility phenotypes by standard agar dilution and disk diffusion techniques and with a commercial microdilution system (PASCO). A Bred ratio (2:1) and a fixed concentration (clavulanate, 2 and 4 mu g/ml; sulbactam, 8 mu g/ml) were used in the agar dilution technique. The resistance frequencies for amoxicillin-clavulanate with different techniques were as follows: fixed ratio agar dilution, 12%; fixed concentration 4-mu g/ml agar dilution, 17%; fixed ratio microdilution, 9%; and disk diffusion, 9%. Marked discrepancies were found when these results were compared,vith those obtained,vith ampicillin-sulbactam (26 to 52% resistance), showing that susceptibility to amoxicillin clavulanic acid cannot be predicted by testing the isolate against ampicillin-sulbactam. Interestingly, the discrimination between susceptible and intermediate isolates was better achieved with 4 mu g of clavulanate per mi than with the fixed ratio. In contrast, amoxicillin susceptibility was not sufficiently restored when 2 mu g of clavulanate per mi was used, particularly in moderate (mean beta-lactamase activity, 50.8 mU/mg of protein) and high-level (215 mU/mg) TEM-1 beta-lactamase producer isolates. Four micrograms of clavulanate per milliliter could be a reasonable alternative to the 2:1 fixed ratio, because most high-level beta-lactamase-hyperproducing isolates would be categorized as nonsusceptible, and low- and moderate-level beta-lactamase-producing isolates would be categorized as nonresistant, This approach cannot be applied to sulbactam, either with the fixed 2:1 ratio or with the 8-mu g/ml fixed concentration, because many low-level beta-lactamase-producing isolates would be classified in the resistant category. These findings call for a review of breakpoints for beta-lactam-S lactamase inhibitor combinations.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:862 / 867
页数:6
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli
    OShaughnessy, EM
    Fahle, GA
    Witebsky, FG
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (07) : 1902 - 1903
  • [2] Correlation of in vitro susceptibility testing results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam using a panel of β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae -: Brief report
    Siu, LK
    Cheng, WL
    Ho, PL
    Ng, WS
    Chau, PY
    Lo, JY
    APMIS, 1998, 106 (09) : 917 - 920
  • [3] Fluoroquinolones vs. amoxicillin-clavulanate or ampicillin-sulbactam were not linked to aortic aneurysm or dissection
    Fekete, Thomas
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 174 (02) : JC22 - JC22
  • [4] A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections
    Matthews, Peter
    Alpert, Marc
    Rahav, Galia
    Rill, Denise
    Zito, Edward
    Gardiner, David
    Pedersen, Ron
    Babinchak, Timothy
    McGovern, Paul C.
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 12
  • [5] A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections
    Peter Matthews
    Marc Alpert
    Galia Rahav
    Denise Rill
    Edward Zito
    David Gardiner
    Ron Pedersen
    Timothy Babinchak
    Paul C McGovern
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 12
  • [6] Establishing the validity of different susceptibility testing methods to evaluate the in vitro activity of amoxicillin-clavulanate against Escherichia coli
    Maria, Diez-Aguilar
    Maria-Isabel, Morosini
    Maria-Carmen, Conejo
    Alvaro, Pascual
    Jorge, Calvo
    Luis, Martinez-Martinez
    Francesc, Marco
    Jordi, Vila
    Adriana, Ortega
    Jesus, Oteo
    Rafael, Canton
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2016, 84 (04) : 334 - 336
  • [7] Molecular characterization of amoxicillin-clavulanate resistance in a clinical isolate of Escherichia coli
    Bellaaj, A
    Bollet, C
    Alfeddy, N
    Limam, F
    Belhadj, C
    Regli, A
    Chollet, R
    Belhadj, M
    Ben-Mahrez, K
    MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE-MECHANISMS EPIDEMIOLOGY AND DISEASE, 2002, 8 (04): : 267 - 272
  • [8] SMALL PLASMIDS ARE INVOLVED IN AMOXICILLIN-CLAVULANATE RESISTANCE IN ESCHERICHIA-COLI
    MARTINEZ, JL
    VICENTE, MF
    DELGADOIRIBARREN, A
    PEREZDIAZ, JC
    BAQUERO, F
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1989, 33 (04) : 595 - 595
  • [9] COMPARATIVE INVITRO ACTIVITIES OF AMOXICILLIN-CLAVULANATE, AMPICILLIN-SULBACTAM AND PIPERACILLIN-TAZOBACTAM AGAINST STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI AND PROTEUS-MIRABILIS HARBORING KNOWN BETA-LACTAMASES
    GATERMANN, S
    MARRE, R
    INFECTION, 1991, 19 (02) : 106 - 109
  • [10] EVALUATION OF INVITRO METHODS FOR TESTING SUSCEPTIBILITY OF ANAEROBES TO AMPICILLIN-SULBACTAM AND AMOXICILLIN-CLAVULANIC ACID
    FUCHS, PC
    BARRY, AL
    JONES, RN
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1988, 26 (06) : 1246 - 1247