The GM debate: Risk, politics and public engagement

被引：0

|

作者：

Heyman, Bob ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, W Yorkshire, England

来源：

HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY | 2011年 / 13卷 / 06期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1080/13698575.2011.615579

中图分类号：

R1 [预防医学、卫生学];

学科分类号：

1004 ; 120402 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：596 / 598

页数：4

相关论文

共 50 条

[1] The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Engagement
Bellamy, Rob
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2012, 21 (07) : 902 - 902
[2] The GM Debate - Risk, politics and public engagement
Joly, Pierre-Benoit
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2008, 11 (07) : 941 - 943
[3] The GM debate. Risk, politics and public engagement
van der Heijden, Hein-Anton
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2009, 18 (03) : 461 - 462
[4] Science, politics, and the GM debate in Europe
Tencalla, F
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 44 (01) : 43 - 48
[5] Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives:: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation?: Public debate about transgenic crops
Rowe, G
Horlick-Jones, T
Walls, J
Pidgeon, N
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2005, 14 (04) : 331 - 352
[6] GM foods: is rational public debate possible?
不详
CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2004, 4 (02) : 193 - 194
[7] The GM public debate: context and communication strategies
Hails, R
Kinderlerer, J
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2003, 4 (10) : 819 - 825
[8] The GM public debate: context and communication strategies
Rosie Hails
Julian Kinderlerer
Nature Reviews Genetics, 2003, 4 : 819 - 825
[9] Ideological differences in engagement in public debate on Twitter
Gaisbauer, Felix
Pournaki, Armin
Banisch, Sven
Olbrich, Eckehard
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
[10] The role of values in risk perception in the GM debate
Bruce, DM
Eldridge, J
FORESIGHT AND PRECAUTION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2000, : 855 - 862

← 1 2 3 4 5 →