From Performance Budgeting to Performance Budget Management: Theory and Practice

被引:37
|
作者
Ho, Alfred Tat-Kei [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Publ Adm, Sch Publ Affairs & Adm, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
ASSESSMENT RATING TOOL; PUBLIC-SECTOR; LOCAL-GOVERNMENTS; STATE; REFORM; IMPLEMENTATION; INCENTIVES; PART; PBB; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1111/puar.12915
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This article examines the decades-long practices of performance budgeting in different countries and their associated challenges from a multilayered institutional framework. Based on theory and lessons learned, the article recommends an array of strategies to address institutional and organizational barriers. It also proposes to reconceptualize performance budgeting as a performance budget management system and suggests how multiyear budget planning, financial risk assessment, policy planning, the departmental budget cycle, the program budget cycle, stakeholder engagement, regular spending reviews, and performance audits should be integrated more closely to address the long-term fiscal challenges faced by many governments and to respond to the public pressure on agencies to do more with less.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 758
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条