Sirolimus use in recipients of expanded criteria donor kidneys

被引:4
|
作者
House, Andrew A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nguan, Christopher Y. [4 ]
Luke, Patrick P. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Med, London, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario Hosp, London Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Nephrol, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
[3] Multiorgan Transplant Program, London, ON, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver Gen Hosp, Dept Urol Sci, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[5] Univ Western Ontario Hosp, London Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Urol, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00003495-200868001-00006
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
With changing donor characteristics and the growing shortage in organ supply, renal transplant practitioners have sought to optimize the use of expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys, which have poorer outcomes than standard criteria donor (SCD) kidneys. The outcomes may represent an acceptable trade-off if ECD transplants offer enhanced overall patient survival by reducing waiting times. ECD kidneys may be more susceptible to toxicity associated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs); therefore, a potential strategy to improve outcomes in this growing demographic is the use of CNI-free immunosuppressive protocols. To date, published clinical studies have demonstrated encouraging outcomes using sirolimus-based CNI-free regimens in SCD kidney transplant recipients. We conducted a pilot study to examine outcomes in ECD kidney transplant recipients receiving a CNI-free quadruple drug regimen, consisting of antithymocyte globulin (ATG), sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and a corticosteroid, compared with outcomes in a retrospective CNI-control group of ECD recipients who had received standard CNI-based immunosuppressive treatment. Patient Survival and allograft survival at I year were not significantly different between the CNI-free group (n = 13) and the CNI-control group (n = 13) [100% vs 92% and 92% vs 85%, respectively]; nor was the incidence of rejection (26% and 31%) or delayed graft function (38% of patients in both groups). Serum creatinine was significantly lower and the estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly higher for the CNI-free group at 3-6 months but not at I year. Protocol biopsies in the CNI-free patients at I year revealed no significant progression of chronic vascular lesions. Banff chronic/sclerosing allograft nephropathy scores were 42% grade 1, 25% grades II and III, and 33% grade 0. Thus, a sirolimus-based CNI-free regimen may improve outcomes in ECD kidney transplant recipients and merits further study.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 49
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sirolimus Use in Recipients of Expanded Criteria Donor Kidneys
    Andrew A. House
    Christopher Y. Nguan
    Patrick P. Luke
    [J]. Drugs, 2008, 68 : 41 - 49
  • [2] Impact of the expanded criteria donor allocation system on candidates for and recipients of expanded criteria donor kidneys
    Sung, Randall S.
    Guidinger, Mary K.
    Leichtman, Alan B.
    Lake, Craig
    Metzger, Robert A.
    Port, Friedrich K.
    Merion, Robert M.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 84 (09) : 1138 - 1144
  • [3] Impact of the expanded criteria donor allocation system on the use of expanded criteria donor kidneys
    Sung, RS
    Guidinger, MK
    Lake, CD
    McBride, MA
    Greenstein, SM
    Delmonico, FL
    Port, FK
    Merion, RM
    Leichtman, AB
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 79 (09) : 1257 - 1261
  • [4] Prospective comparison of the use of sirolimus and cyclosporine in recipients of a kidney from an expanded criteria donor
    Durrbach, Antoine
    Rostaing, Lionel
    Tricot, Leila
    Ouali, Nacera
    Wolf, Philippe
    Pouteil-Noble, Claire
    Kessler, Michele
    Viron, Beatrice
    Thervet, Eric
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 85 (03) : 486 - 490
  • [5] Expanded Criteria Donor Kidneys for Younger Recipients: Acceptable Outcomes
    Goplani, K. R.
    Kute, V. B.
    Vanikar, A. V.
    Shah, P. R.
    Gumber, M. R.
    Patel, H. V.
    Modi, P. R.
    Trivedi, H. L.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 42 (10) : 3931 - 3934
  • [6] Comparable Patient and Graft Outcomes in Recipients of Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) and Older Recipients of Standard Criteria Donor (SCD) Kidneys
    Sando, S. M.
    Chakkera, H. A.
    Bodner, J. K.
    Devarapalli, Y.
    Heilman, R. L.
    Hamawi, K.
    Mulligan, D. C.
    Moss, A. A.
    Reddy, K. S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 : 425 - 426
  • [7] Use of expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys - a comparative study
    Hossain, N.
    Gogalniceanu, P.
    Uwechue, R.
    Mamode, N.
    Kessaris, N.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 : 205 - 205
  • [8] The use of expanded criteria cadaver and live donor kidneys for transplantation
    Modlin, CS
    Goldfard, DA
    Novick, AC
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (04) : 687 - +
  • [9] Excessive mortality rates in older kidney recipients of expanded criteria donor kidneys.
    Kauffman, HM
    McBride, MA
    Roza, AM
    Delmonico, FL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 : 283 - 283
  • [10] Surveillance Registry of Sirolimus Use in Recipients of Kidney Allografts From Expanded Criteria Donors
    Laham, G.
    Scuteri, R.
    Arriola, M.
    Raffaele, P.
    Davalos Michel, M.
    Imperiali, N.
    Fortunato, R.
    Maggiora, E.
    Vicenta Sal, M.
    Soler Pujol, G.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 98 : 647 - 647