Nitrogen sources for organic vegetable crops

被引:143
|
作者
Gaskell, Mark
Smith, Richard
机构
[1] Univ Calif Cooperat Extens, Santa Maria, CA 93455 USA
[2] Univ Calif Cooperat Extens, Salinas, CA 93901 USA
关键词
sustainable agriculture; fertilizers; compost; green manure crops;
D O I
10.21273/HORTTECH.17.4.431
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Fertilization is the most expensive cultural practice for the increasing numbers of organic vegetable growers in the United States. Nitrogen (N) is the most important and costly nutrient to manage, and cost-effective N management practices are needed for efficient organic vegetable production. There is a wide array of organic N sources available, but they vary in cost, N content, and N availability. Compost and cover crops are commonly used sources of N for vegetables because they are relatively inexpensive and offer additional nutrients or soil improvement qualities in addition to N. Studies have shown that compost quality factors that affect N mineralization vary by source and among different batches from the same source. Compost carbon to N ratio should be equal to or less than 20:1 to assure net short-term mineralization. Cover crops also vary in N content and mineralization rate after incorporation. Leguminous cover crops decompose and release N more rapidly than grass or cereal cover crops at the preheading stage typically incorporated. Even the most efficient N-supplying composts, cover crops, or other organic N sources do not release appreciable N to a subsequent crop beyond 6 to 8 weeks from incorporation, and this burst of early N may not synchronize with N requirements for many vegetable crops. Other potential organic fertilizer N sources have been evaluated for vegetables, and they vary in N cost and N mineralization rate. Materials evaluated include seabird guano, liquid fish, feather meal, corn meal (Zea mays), blood meal, and liquid soybean meal (Glycine max) among others. Of those evaluated, feather meal, seabird guano, and liquid fish stand out as more economical organic sources of available N. Organic sources generally lack uniformity and are bulky, unstable, and inconsistent as a group, and this contributes to additional hidden management costs for organic growers. Liquid organic N sources for use in microirrigation systems may have additional disadvantages caused by loss of valuable nutrient N that is removed by filters.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 441
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Organic nitrogen sources for vegetable crops
    Gaskell, Mark
    HORTSCIENCE, 2006, 41 (04) : 957 - 957
  • [2] Nitrogen uptake response of vegetable crops to organic materials
    Matsumoto, S
    Ae, N
    Yamagata, M
    SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 1999, 45 (02) : 269 - 278
  • [3] Use of Digestate as Organic Amendment and Source of Nitrogen to Vegetable Crops
    Horta, Carmo
    Carneiro, Joao Paulo
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [4] UTILIZATION OF NITROGEN BY VEGETABLE CROPS
    IKEDA, H
    JARQ-JAPAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1991, 25 (02): : 117 - 124
  • [5] Nitrogen management of vegetable crops
    Tei, Francesco
    De Neve, Stefaan
    de Haan, Janjo
    Kristensen, Hanne Lakkenborg
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2020, 240 (240)
  • [6] Limited benefits of summer cover crops on nitrogen cycling in organic vegetable production
    John Allar
    Gabriel Maltais-Landry
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2022, 122 : 119 - 138
  • [7] Limited benefits of summer cover crops on nitrogen cycling in organic vegetable production
    Allar, John
    Maltais-Landry, Gabriel
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2022, 122 (02) : 119 - 138
  • [8] Nitrogen and field production of vegetable crops
    Rahn, CR
    8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TIMING OF FIELD PRODUCTION IN VEGETABLE CROPS, 2000, (533): : 361 - 369
  • [9] NITROGEN FERTILISER REQUIREMENTS OF VEGETABLE CROPS
    GREENWOOD, DJ
    CLEAVER, TJ
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1971, 22 (08) : 435 - +
  • [10] ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF NITROGEN FOR CROPS
    NUTMAN, PS
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY OF ENGLAND, 1976, 137 : 86 - &