Evaluation of VMAT Planning Strategies for Prostate Patients with Bilateral Hip Prosthesis

被引:6
|
作者
To, David [1 ]
Xhaferllari, Ilma [1 ]
Liu, Manju [1 ]
Liang, Jian [2 ]
Knill, Cory [3 ]
Nandalur, Sirisha [1 ]
Gustafson, Gary [1 ]
Lack, Danielle [1 ]
机构
[1] Beaumont Hlth, Troy, MI USA
[2] Beaumont Hlth, Royal Oak, MI USA
[3] Beaumont Hlth, Dearborn, MI USA
关键词
VOLUMETRIC-MODULATED ARC; THERAPY; CANCER; CONFORMITY; IMRT;
D O I
10.1177/15330338211038490
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: In this study, we investigate linac volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning strategies for bilateral hip prostheses prostate patients with respect to plan quality and deliverability, while limiting entrance dose to the prostheses. Methods: Three VMAT plans were retrospectively created for 20 patients: (1) partial arcs (PA), (2) 2 full arcs optimized with 500 cGy max prostheses dose (MD), and (3) 2 full arcs optimized with max dose-volume histogram (DVH) constraint of 500 cGy to 10% prostheses volume (MDVH). PA techniques contained 6 PA with beam angles that avoid entering each prosthesis. For each patient, other than prostheses constraints, the same Pinnacle VMAT optimization objectives were used. Plans were normalized with PTV D95% = 79.2 Gy prescription dose. Organ-at-risk DVH metrics, monitor units (MUs), conformality, gradient, and homogeneity indices were evaluated for each plan. Mean entrance prosthesis dose was determined in Pinnacle by converting each arc into static beams and utilizing only control points traversing each prosthesis. Plan deliverability was evaluated with SunNuclear ArcCheck measurements (gamma criteria 3%/2 mm) on an Elekta machine. Results: MD and MDVH had similar dosimetric quality, both improved DVH metrics for rectum and bladder compared to PA. Plan complexities among all plans were similar (average MUs: 441-518). Conformality, homogeneity, and gradient indices were significantly improved in MD and MDVH versus PA (P < .001). Gamma pass rates for MD (99.0 +/- 1.2%) and MDVH (99.2 +/- 0.99%) were comparable. A significant difference over PA was observed (96.8 +/- 1.6%, P < .001). Field-by-field analysis demonstrated 12/20 PA plans resulted in fields with pass rates Conclusion: MD and MDVH plans had improved dosimetric quality and deliverability over PA plans with minimal entrance doses (similar to 1% of prescription) to each prosthesis and are an improved alternative for bilateral prostheses prostate patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of VMAT Planning Strategies for Prostate Patients with Bilateral Hip Prostheses
    To, D.
    Xhaferllari, I.
    Liu, M.
    Liang, J.
    Knill, C.
    Yan, D.
    Nandalur, S.
    Gustafson, G.
    Lack, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E430 - E430
  • [2] Evaluation of VMAT & IMRT Planning Strategies for Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients with Bilateral Hip Prostheses
    Xu, J.
    Cosely, T.
    Bouton, T.
    Zhang, B.
    Han, D.
    Zhou, J.
    Chen, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E916 - E916
  • [3] Experimental Validation of a VMAT Planning Technique for Patients with Hip Prosthesis
    Milette, M.
    Sporn, L.
    Robinson, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3628 - 3629
  • [4] A case study of radiotherapy planning for a bilateral metal hip prosthesis prostate cancer patient
    Su, A
    Reft, C
    Rash, C
    Price, J
    Jani, AB
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2005, 30 (03) : 169 - 175
  • [5] Bilateral hip prosthesis and the radiotherapy management of prostate carcinoma
    Lupton, S. C.
    Sanghera, P.
    Farley, R.
    Rogers, J.
    Green, S.
    Jones, B.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 19 (03) : S37 - S37
  • [6] Evaluation of geometrical uncertainties on localized prostate radiotherapy of patients with bilateral metallic hip prostheses using 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT: A planning study
    Soda, Rikana
    Hatanaka, Shogo
    Hariu, Masatsugu
    Shimbo, Munefumi
    Yamano, Takafumi
    Nishimura, Keiichiro
    Kondo, Shuichi
    Utsumi, Nobuko
    Takahashi, Takeo
    JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 28 (02) : 243 - 254
  • [7] An Opposed Matched Beam IMRT Technique for Prostate Cancer Patients with Bilateral Hip Prosthesis
    Fattahi, S.
    Ostapiak, O.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (09) : 4312 - 4313
  • [8] Radiobiological Evaluation of Physical Metrics in IMPT and VMAT Planning for Prostate Cancer Patient with Metal Hip Prostheses
    Hsi, W.
    Lee, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [9] The robustness of prostate radiotherapy for patients with hip prosthesis
    Nadhum, Miia
    Boman, Eeva
    Rossi, Maija
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2021, 46 (03) : 212 - 218
  • [10] PLANNING OF RADIOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH HIP-PROSTHESIS
    ERLANSON, M
    FRANZEN, L
    HENRIKSSON, R
    LITTBRAND, B
    LOFROTH, PO
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 20 (05): : 1093 - 1098