A risk-benefit assessment of naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence

被引:49
|
作者
Berg, BJ [1 ]
Pettinati, HM [1 ]
Volpicelli, JR [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV PENN,ADDICT TREATMENT RES CTR,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19104
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00002018-199615040-00005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
There is a great deal of interest in the use of naltrexone as a treatment for alcohol (ethanol) dependence since there is a rapidly expanding body of evidence to support its efficacy and tolerability in this indication, Naltrexone, a long-acting, nonselective opioid receptor antagonist has been shown to reduce alcohol intake when combined with behavioural treatment, Naltrexone may prevent the return to clinically significant drinking by blocking the pleasurable effects or 'high' associated with alcohol drinking. Results from controlled studies showed that in alcohol dependent patients taking naltrexone 50 mg/day in combination with behavioural treatment, relapse rates were reduced by 50% compared with placebo treated patients. Historically, several factors have limited the use of effective pharmacological adjuncts In the treatment of alcohol dependence, These include safety considerations in this vulnerable population, and the fact that some treatment programmes discourage alcohol-dependent patients from taking medications, The must common adverse effects reported with the use of naltrexone at a dosage of 50 mg/day include nausea and vomiting, Naltrexone does not appear to be hepatotoxic in dosages recommended in the treatment of alcohol dependence, i.e. 50 mg/day. Thus, naltrexone appears to offer significant therapeutic benefits at a relatively low risk, when used judiciously and with behavioural treatment for alcohol dependent patients.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 282
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Alcohol dependence treatment with naltrexone:: safety assessment
    Mangado, O
    Horcajadas, A
    Hernández, T
    [J]. ACTAS ESPANOLAS DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2000, 28 (03): : 161 - 168
  • [2] A risk-benefit assessment of mirtazapine in the treatment of depression
    Kasper, S
    PraschakRieder, N
    Tauscher, J
    Wolf, R
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 1997, 17 (04) : 251 - 264
  • [3] A Risk-Benefit Assessment of Octreotide in the Treatment of Acromegaly
    Aart Jan van der Lely
    Wouter W. de Herder
    Steven W. J. Lamberts
    [J]. Drug Safety, 1997, 17 : 317 - 324
  • [4] A risk-benefit assessment of sulpiride in the treatment of schizophrenia
    Mauri, MC
    Bravin, S
    Bitetto, A
    Rudelli, R
    Invernizzi, G
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 1996, 14 (05) : 288 - 298
  • [5] A risk-benefit assessment of octreotide in the treatment of acromegaly
    vanderLely, AJ
    deHerder, WW
    Lamberts, SWJ
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 1997, 17 (05) : 317 - 324
  • [6] A RISK-BENEFIT ASSESSMENT OF TEICOPLANIN IN THE TREATMENT OF INFECTIONS
    DELALLA, F
    TRAMARIN, A
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 1995, 13 (05) : 317 - 328
  • [7] A Risk-Benefit Assessment of Mirtazapine in the Treatment of Depression
    Siegfried Kasper
    Nicole Praschak-Rieder
    Johannes Tauscher
    Rainer Wolf
    [J]. Drug Safety, 1997, 17 : 251 - 264
  • [8] A risk-benefit assessment of agents used in the treatment of scabies
    Elgart, ML
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 1996, 14 (06) : 386 - 393
  • [9] A Risk-Benefit Assessment of Losartan Potassium in the Treatment of Hypertension
    Louise M. Burrell
    [J]. Drug Safety, 1997, 16 : 56 - 65
  • [10] A Risk-Benefit Assessment of Alendronate in the Treatment of Involutional Osteoporosis
    Jean-Pierre Devogelaer
    [J]. Drug Safety, 1998, 19 : 141 - 154