Efficacy and tolerability of mexiletine treatment in patients with recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks

被引:12
|
作者
Sobiech, Marcin [1 ]
Lewandowski, Michal [1 ]
Zajac, Dariusz [1 ]
Maciag, Aleksander [1 ]
Syska, Pawel [1 ]
Atenska-Pawlowska, Joanna [1 ]
Kowalik, Ilona [1 ]
Sterlinski, Maciej [1 ]
Szwed, Hanna [1 ]
Pytkowski, Mariusz [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Cardiol, Dept Coronary Artery Dis 2, Ul Spartanska 1, PL-02637 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
electrical storm; implantable defibrillator; mexiletine; ventricular tachyarrhythmia; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; THERAPY; AMIODARONE; PREVENTION; EVENTS;
D O I
10.5603/KP.2017.0189
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Antiarrhythmic treatment of patients with recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmia, in whom catheter ablation and amiodarone treatment were ineffective or contraindicated, is an unsolved clinical problem. Aim: The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of mexiletine in patients with recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and/or electrical storm events, in whom standard treatment strategies failed to prevent ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients treated with mexiletine for recurrent ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation in our institution between January 2011 and September 2015. The primary endpoints were total number of electrical storm events and ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) episodes after the beginning of mexiletine therapy. Secondary endpoints were total number of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies and discontinuation of the therapy. Events were compared with a matched duration period before initiating mexiletine. Patients served as self-controls. Results: Seventeen patients were included in the study; 11 patients were males. Mean age was 64.2 15.4 years. The median time of mexiletine treatment was eight months (interquartile range [IR]: 1-22 months). The mexiletine dose was 600 mg/day in 13 patients and 400 mg/day in four patients. In four patients the dose was modified during treatment in a range from 400 to 600 mg/day depending on clinical decision. Treatment with mexiletine significantly reduced the number of electrical storm events (14 episodes vs. two episodes; median and IR for 17 patients: 1 [0-1] vs. 0 [0-0], p = 0.0010), VT/VF episodes (285 vs. 74 episodes; median and IR for 17 patients: 7 [5-27] vs. 0 [0-5], p = 0.0115), and ICD interventions (317 interventions vs. nine interventions; median and IR for 17 patients: 10 [5-25] vs. 0 [0-2], p = 0.0006), in comparison with a matched period before initiation of treatment. In 14 out of 17 patients (82%) sufficient tolerability of mexiletine was observed. Only in three (18%) patients severe side effects of mexiletine treatment occurred requiring discontinuation of therapy. Conclusions: Mexiletine was a sufficiently tolerated antiarrhythmic drug in short-term treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the studied population. Mexiletine may be effective in the treatment of recurring ventricular tachyarrhythmias or electrical storm events.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1032
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oral mexiletine for ventricular tachyarrhythmias treatment in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients: a systematic review of the literature
    Ali, Hussam
    Cristiano, Ernesto
    Lupo, Pierpaolo
    Foresti, Sara
    De Ambroggi, Guido
    De Lucia, Carmine
    Turturiello, Dario
    Paganini, Edoardo M.
    Bessi, Riccardo
    Farghaly, Ahmad A.
    Nicoli, Leoluca
    Cappato, Riccardo
    MINERVA CARDIOLOGY AND ANGIOLOGY, 2023, 71 (06) : 622 - 630
  • [2] Counterpoint: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias increase mortality
    Dorian, Paul
    HEART RHYTHM, 2012, 9 (07) : 1158 - 1158
  • [3] Point: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias increase mortality
    Sweeney, Michael O.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2012, 9 (06) : 985 - 987
  • [4] Counterpoint: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias do not increase mortality
    Dorian, Paul
    HEART RHYTHM, 2012, 9 (06) : 988 - 991
  • [5] Resolving the conflict: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias increase mortality
    Swerdlow, Charles
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    Klein, George J.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2012, 9 (08) : 1328 - 1330
  • [6] CIRCADIAN VARIATION OF SUSTAINED VENTRICULAR TACHYARRHYTHMIAS TERMINATED BY APPROPRIATE SHOCKS IN PATIENTS WITH AN IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR
    BEHRENS, S
    GALECKA, M
    BRUGGEMANN, T
    EHLERS, C
    WILLICH, SN
    ZISS, W
    DISSMANN, R
    ANDRESEN, D
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1995, 130 (01) : 79 - 84
  • [7] PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF THE IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR IN VENTRICULAR TACHYARRHYTHMIAS
    LUDERITZ, B
    JUNG, W
    DEISTER, A
    MARNEROS, A
    MANZ, M
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 16 (09): : 1815 - 1821
  • [8] USE OF THE AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR IN THE TREATMENT OF MALIGNANT VENTRICULAR TACHYARRHYTHMIAS
    MIROWSKI, M
    REID, PR
    MOWER, MM
    WATKINS, L
    PLATIA, EV
    GRIFFITH, LSC
    JUANTEGUY, JM
    HERZ, 1984, 9 (02) : 83 - 89
  • [9] Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in patients with ventricular assist devices
    Gkouziouta, A.
    Katsianis, A.
    Kostopoulou, A.
    Cokkinos, P. H.
    Karavolias, G.
    Maounis, T. H.
    Livanis, E.
    Theodorakis, G.
    Sfirakis, P.
    Adamopoulos, S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 259 - 260
  • [10] Circadian pattern of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
    Fries, R
    Heisel, A
    Jung, J
    Stopp, M
    Schieffer, H
    Ozbek, C
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 1996, 85 (02): : 140 - 147